Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPaulsen, Adam J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Alexen_US
dc.contributor.authorFischer, Mary E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yanjunen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Guan-Huaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKlein, Barbara E. K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKlein, Ronalden_US
dc.contributor.authorCruickshanks, Karen J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-05T01:59:47Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-05T01:59:47Z-
dc.date.issued1970-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0928-6586en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2020.1791909en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/154913-
dc.description.abstractPurpose To determine if incidence of contrast sensitivity (CS) impairment differs by generation and identify factors to explain these differences. Methods The Beaver Dam Eye Study (BDES) and Beaver Dam Offspring Study (BOSS) are cohort studies of aging adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. Baseline examinations occurred from 1993 to 1995 (BDES) and 2005-2008 (BOSS). Follow-up examinations occurred in five-year intervals. CS testing was conducted with Pelli-Robson letter sensitivity charts; Incident impairment was a log CS score <1.55 in either eye at follow-up. Associations of incidence with generation were investigated using estimated hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Participants (N = 3185) had a mean age of 51.9 years at baseline (standard deviation = 9.9) and 51.9% were female. Ten-year cumulative incidence of CS impairment was 40.1%, was higher among women (41.7%) than men (38.8%), and increased by age group. The risk of incident CS impairment decreased by 39% per generation. In multivariable models, the Baby Boom Generation (HR = 0.42, 95%CI = 0.31, 0.58) and Generation X (HR = 0.56, 95%CI = 0.34, 0.91) had a significantly decreased risk of CS impairment compared to the Greatest Generation. Results were similar in sensitivity analyses excluding those with cataract, age-related macular degeneration, or visual acuity impairment. Conclusion The risk of incident CS impairment decreased by birth cohort, with the greatest reduction in the Baby Boom Generation. The difference in risk suggests that there are unknown modifiable risk factors that may help to further explain the etiology of CS impairment and provide potential pathways for prevention in the future.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectEpidemiologyen_US
dc.subjectBirth Cohort Effecten_US
dc.subjectContrast Sensitivityen_US
dc.subjectVisual Functionen_US
dc.subjectAgingen_US
dc.titleGenerational Differences in the 10-year Incidence of Impaired Contrast Sensitivityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09286586.2020.1791909en_US
dc.identifier.journalOPHTHALMIC EPIDEMIOLOGYen_US
dc.citation.spage0en_US
dc.citation.epage0en_US
dc.contributor.department統計學研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Statisticsen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000550940200001en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles