Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTeng, JYen_US
dc.contributor.authorTzeng, GHen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:02:56Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:02:56Z-
dc.date.issued1996en_US
dc.identifier.issn0308-1060en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/1549-
dc.description.abstractThis paper proposes the fuzzy multicriteria ranking method to conduct the evaluation of urban transportation investment alternatives. Since urban transportation investment is a public investment problem, which requires that various aspects of impacts upon different interest groups be considered, it is therefore regarded as a multicriteria decision making and group decision making problem. In view of future uncertainties, since investment alternatives cannot be cleared in terms of numerical values under the anticipated achievement values of each criterion, it is then considered to be within the range of fuzziness. To make it easier to put the application to practical use, this paper has used triangular fuzzy numbers to spell out the possible range of the anticipated achievement values, whereas the principle of majority rule is used to establish weights and the anticipated achievement values of the triangular fuzzy numbers. From fuzzy weights and fuzzy achievement values, the fuzzy synthetic achievement values of investment alternatives can then be derived. This paper has further revised the Kim-Park method so as to perform the superiority and inferiority comparisons among the fuzzy synthetic achievement values, in the hope that the degree of optimism and pessimism of most of the experts in the decision making group can be demonstrated without each expert stating his/her preferences. An example is used to exemplify the method being presented.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjecturbanen_US
dc.subjecttransportation investmenten_US
dc.subjectfuzzy setsen_US
dc.subjectmulticriteria ranking methoden_US
dc.subjectmultiple criteria decision makingen_US
dc.subjectrankingen_US
dc.titleFuzzy multicriteria ranking of urban transportation investment alternativesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.journalTRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGYen_US
dc.citation.volume20en_US
dc.citation.issue1en_US
dc.citation.spage15en_US
dc.citation.epage31en_US
dc.contributor.department交大名義發表zh_TW
dc.contributor.department運輸與物流管理系 註:原交通所+運管所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentNational Chiao Tung Universityen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Transportation and Logistics Managementen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:A1996VM45700002-
dc.citation.woscount54-
Appears in Collections:Articles