完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorChen, Cheryl Chia-Huien_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Chiung-Nienen_US
dc.contributor.authorLai, I-Rueen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Guan-Huaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:21:53Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:21:53Z-
dc.date.issued2012-03-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0029-6562en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182447844en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/15575-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Older hospitalized patients often experience geriatric syndromes that may be prevented using complex interventions. For example, the Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP) was shown to be successful, but sites with limited resources might find HELP costly. Thus, modifying HELP to include only key components might prove more cost-effective. Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a modified HELP intervention derived from a conceptual model of shared geriatric risk factors for older hospitalized patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Method: The modified HELP intervention was developed and evaluated in Taiwan, based on the UK Medical Research Council evaluation framework. According to this 4-phase framework, HELP (Phase 1) was modified based on a theoretical model of shared risk factors, and HELP's feasibility and efficacy (Phases 2 and 3) were evaluated between August 2007 and April 2009 in a preintervention and post-intervention pilot trial. Participants were 179 patients enrolled as the control (n = 77) and intervention (n = 102) groups. Results: The modified HELP intervention targeting 3 shared risk factors (cognitive, functional, and nutritional status) was developed and implemented successfully on a surgical ward. By hospital discharge, patients in the intervention group experienced significantly less risk for five geriatric syndromes: functional dependence, malnutrition, in-hospital weight loss 95%, depression, and sleep disturbance (adjusted odds ratio = 0.01-0.39; p<.05). These results were independent of patients' baseline malnutrition, education, periampullary diagnosis, and duration of surgery. Conclusions: The positive findings of this pilot trial support continued development of modified HELP. The next logical step in testing its effectiveness and long-term benefit is a randomized controlled trial.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectacute care of older adultsen_US
dc.subjectcomplex interventionsen_US
dc.subjectgeriatric syndromesen_US
dc.subjectHospital Elder Life Programen_US
dc.subjectprogram evaluationen_US
dc.subjectshared risk factorsen_US
dc.titleDevelopment and Evaluation of a Modified Hospital Elder Life Programen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182447844en_US
dc.identifier.journalNURSING RESEARCHen_US
dc.citation.volume61en_US
dc.citation.issue2en_US
dc.citation.spage111en_US
dc.citation.epage118en_US
dc.contributor.department統計學研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Statisticsen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000301288900006-
dc.citation.woscount0-
顯示於類別:期刊論文