完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.author陳炯志zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChiung-Chih Chenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-22T01:05:33Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-22T01:05:33Z-
dc.date.issued2020-12-15en_US
dc.identifier.issn2523-0298en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://lawreview.law.nycu.edu.tw/%e5%be%9e%e8%87%ba%e9%9f%93%e7%a7%bb%e5%b7%a5%e8%81%98%e5%83%b1%e6%ad%b7%e5%8f%b2%e6%80%9d%e7%b4%a2%e8%87%ba%e7%81%a3%e7%9b%b4%e6%8e%a5%e8%81%98%e5%83%b1%e5%88%b6%e5%ba%a6%e7%9a%84%e6%94%b9%e5%96%84/en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/155883-
dc.description.abstract臺灣從1989 年首次開放引進外籍勞力,至今30 年。仲介競爭訂單的商業模式形塑了臺灣的移工市場,使得高額仲介費用一直是臺灣移工市場的重要問題。2007 年開始的直接聘僱聯合服務中心,企圖在既有的仲介制度之外提供另一個不同的管道。經過近12 年直聘制度的實施與改變,但透過直接聘僱中心聘僱外籍移工的比例並不高,並且有下降趨勢。為何這麼少人願意直聘?本文試圖爬梳直聘制度的轉變,分析與直聘制度相關的關鍵行動者,並且比較韓國的聘僱許可制EPS(Employment Permit System),以國對國方式引進外籍勞力的制度發展以及對於私人仲介制度的影響。原因在於目前的制度設計在於提供私人仲介之外的另一個管道,而非企圖取代仲介制度。因此本文提出三個建議:1.強化直聘中心平臺功能與在地服務的分布;2.強化企業社會責任,推廣直接聘僱;3.透過更多關鍵行動者,連結勞力輸出與接收國,官方、NGO 組織與學術界。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractTaiwan introduced foreign labor for the first time in 1989, and it has been 30 years. The business model of intermediary competition has shaped Taiwan’s migrant market, making high placement fees always an important issue. The direct hiring of joint service centers, which began in 2007, seeks to provide a different channel beyond the existing agency system. However, the proportion of foreign migrants hired through direct hiring is not high, and there is a downward trend. After the implementation and change of the direct hiring system in the past 12 years, the proportion of hiring foreign workers through direct hiring center is not high, and there is a downward trend. Why are so few people willing to hire directly? This article attempts to review the changes in the direct hiring system, analyze the key actors related to it, and compare the Korean Employment Permit System (EPS), which introduced foreign labor in a government to government manner, and Impacts on broker system in Korea. The reason is that the current system design is to provide another channel other than private agencies, rather than trying to replace it. Therefore, this article proposes three suggestions: 1. Strengthen the function of the direct hiring center platform and the distribution of local services. 2. Strengthen corporate social responsibility and promote direct hiring. 3. Link labor exporting and receiving countries with more key actors, local government, NGOs and academia.en_US
dc.language.isozh_TWen_US
dc.publisher交通大學科技法律學院(原名稱:交通大學科技法律研究所)zh_TW
dc.publisherNCTU School of Lawen_US
dc.subject直接聘僱zh_TW
dc.subject仲介費zh_TW
dc.subject政府對政府zh_TW
dc.subject企業社會責任zh_TW
dc.subject聘僱許可制(EPS)zh_TW
dc.subjectDirect Hiringen_US
dc.subjectPlacement Feeen_US
dc.subjectGovernment to Governmenten_US
dc.subjectCorporate Social Responsibilityen_US
dc.subjectEmployment Permit System (EPS)en_US
dc.title從臺韓移工聘僱歷史思索臺灣直接聘僱制度的改善之道zh_TW
dc.titleReflecting on the Historical Process of Foreign Workers Policies of Taiwan and South Korea -A Solution for Current Taiwan’s Direct Hiring Systemen_US
dc.typeCampus Publicationsen_US
dc.identifier.journal交大法學評論(原名稱:科技法學評論)zh_TW
dc.identifier.journalNCTU Law Reviewen_US
dc.citation.issue勞動法特刊en_US
dc.citation.spage195en_US
dc.citation.epage225en_US
顯示於類別:交大法學評論


文件中的檔案:

  1. NO.S-5.pdf

若為 zip 檔案,請下載檔案解壓縮後,用瀏覽器開啟資料夾中的 index.html 瀏覽全文。