Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author邱忠義zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorJong-Yi Chiouen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-24T23:31:44Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-24T23:31:44Z-
dc.date.issued2022-09en_US
dc.identifier.issn2523-0298en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://lawreview.law.nycu.edu.tw/%e6%aa%a2%e5%af%9f%e5%ae%98%e5%b0%b1%e8%a2%ab%e5%91%8a%e5%85%b7%e3%80%8c%e7%b4%af%e7%8a%af%e4%ba%8b%e5%af%a6%e3%80%8d%e5%8f%8a%e3%80%8c%e5%8a%a0%e9%87%8d%e9%87%8f%e5%88%91%e4%ba%8b%e9%a0%85%e3%80%8d/en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/161718-
dc.description.abstract臺灣司法實務雖早已改採改良式當事人進行主義,惟仍有若干思維殘存糾問主義色彩,尤其是對被告不利益之事項,仍遺留著職權進行主義之餘威。以累犯為例,司法實務向認為關於被告具有「累犯事實」以及「應加重量刑之事項」,屬於法院認定事實與適用法律之基礎事項,客觀上有調查之必要性,法院「應」依職權加以調查。惟最高法院刑事大法庭 110 年度台上大字第 5660 號裁定,藉助於司法院釋字第 775 號解釋所蘊涵的司法改革理路,做出震撼性的宣告:上開累犯事項,應分別由檢察官負舉證、說明責任。此一裁定,雖是最高法院擺脫職權進行主義舊例的一小步,但已足以將司法改革之路往前推進一大步。zh_TW
dc.description.abstracten_US
dc.language.isozh_TWen_US
dc.publisher陽明交通大學科技法律學院(原名稱:交通大學科技法律研究所)zh_TW
dc.publisherNYCU School of Lawen_US
dc.subject改良式當事人進行主義zh_TW
dc.subject累犯zh_TW
dc.subject舉證責任zh_TW
dc.subject說明責任zh_TW
dc.subject嚴格證明zh_TW
dc.subjectModified Adversary Systemen_US
dc.subjectRepeated Offendingen_US
dc.subjectBurden of Proofen_US
dc.subjectProvideen_US
dc.subjectRule of Strict Proofen_US
dc.title檢察官就被告具「累犯事實」及「加重量刑事項」之舉證或說明責任──以最高法院刑事大法庭110年度台上大字第5660號裁定為中心zh_TW
dc.titleProsecutors Shall Bear the Burden of Proof with the Obligation for Providing Clear Explanations of “Facts for Repeated Offending” and “Crimes that Should Be Aggregated”: Centered on “110 Year Taishang Dazi No. 5660” Ruling of the Supreme Court of Taiwanen_US
dc.typeCampus Publicationsen_US
dc.identifier.journal交大法學評論(原名稱:科技法學評論)zh_TW
dc.identifier.journalNCTU Law Reviewen_US
dc.citation.issue11en_US
dc.citation.spage95en_US
dc.citation.epage134en_US
Appears in Collections:Technology Law Review


Files in This Item:

  1. NO.11-3.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.