Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTsai, Candace S. -J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez, Henocen_US
dc.contributor.authorMunoz, Christian E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Cheng-Yuen_US
dc.contributor.authorTsai, Chuen-Jinnen_US
dc.contributor.authorBarry, Carolen_US
dc.contributor.authorEllenbecker, Michael J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:23:56Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:23:56Z-
dc.date.issued2012-07-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1388-0764en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/989en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/16655-
dc.description.abstract"In this study, nanoalumina and nanoclay particles were compounded separately with ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) polymer to produce nanocomposites using a twin-screw extruder to investigate exposure and effective controls. Nanoparticle exposures from compounding processes were elevated under some circumstances and were affected by many factors including inadequate ventilation, surrounding air flow, feeder type, feeding method, and nanoparticle type. Engineering controls such as improved ventilation and enclosure of releasing sources were applied to the process equipment to evaluate the effectiveness of control. The nanoparticle loading device was modified by installing a ventilated enclosure surrounding the loading chamber. Exposures were studied using designed controls for comparison which include three scenarios: (1) no isolation; (2) enclosed sources; and (3) enclosed sources and improved ventilation. Particle number concentrations for diameters from 5 to 20,000 nm measured by the Fast Mobility Particle Sizer and aerodynamic particle sizer were studied. Aerosol particles were sampled on transmission electron microscope grids to characterize particle composition and morphology. Measurements and samples were taken at the near-and far-field areas relative to releasing sources. Airborne particle concentrations were reduced significantly when using the feeder enclosure, and the concentrations were below the baseline when two sources were enclosed, and the ventilation was improved when using either nanoalumina or nanoclay as fillers."en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectAirborne nanoparticleen_US
dc.subjectNanoaluminaen_US
dc.subjectNanoclayen_US
dc.subjectNanocomposite compoundingen_US
dc.subjectInhalation exposureen_US
dc.subjectEngineering controlen_US
dc.titleExposure assessment and engineering control strategies for airborne nanoparticles: an application to emissions from nanocomposite compounding processesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi989en_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCHen_US
dc.citation.volume14en_US
dc.citation.issue7en_US
dc.citation.epageen_US
dc.contributor.department環境工程研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000306058900043-
dc.citation.woscount3-
Appears in Collections:Articles


Files in This Item:

  1. 000306058900043.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.