Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChu, PYen_US
dc.contributor.authorWu, SSen_US
dc.contributor.authorDing, CGen_US
dc.contributor.authorChang, WCWen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:27:16Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:27:16Z-
dc.date.issued1998en_US
dc.identifier.isbn7-80003-421-6en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/19507-
dc.description.abstractMany managerial studies have indicated that the relative importance of the appealing of working factors far the working environment is perceived differently by different working classes. Different parties may rank the same working factors in different sequences according to their perceived importance. How do we establish a ranking vector of the attractive working factors for a set of employees? How do we compare the ranking vectors from different sets of employees? These issues need to be effectively handled to improve management quality. The concept of multiple comparisons of ranking vectors can be applied in many managerial applications, such as selecting portfolios, designing training programs, positioning, peer-ranking, conducting performance appraisal and so on. This paper discusses the concept of multiple comparisons of ranking vectors, and proposed a method for implementation. An empirical survey data regarding expectation and perception of a training program in a firm is used for illustration.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleMultiple comparisons of ranking vectorsen_US
dc.typeProceedings Paperen_US
dc.identifier.journalFIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGMENT SCIENCE: PROCEEDINGS OF IE & MS '98en_US
dc.citation.spage133en_US
dc.citation.epage138en_US
dc.contributor.department管理科學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Management Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000078188500026-
Appears in Collections:Conferences Paper