Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKu, Pei-Yunen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Robert Kuo-Kuangen_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Shyr-Yeuen_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Ming-Hueien_US
dc.contributor.authorHwu, Yuh-Mingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:28:51Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:28:51Z-
dc.date.issued2012-12-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1058-0468en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9874-zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/20847-
dc.description.abstractTo compare the clinical outcomes between fresh and vitrified-thawed day 5 blastocyst transfers. Retrospective case control study. Tertiary referral center. Patients 38 years of age or less who underwent IVF/ICSI cycles with fresh or frozen-thawed blastocysts transferred from June 1, 2009 to November 30, 2011 Vitrification and thawing of day 5 blastocysts using the Cryotop method. (Kitazato BioPharma Co., Ltd., Fuji city, Shizuoka, Japan) Clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, and multiple pregnancy rates. Of the 118 cycles in the fresh transfer group, 234 blastocysts were transferred. The clinical pregnancy rate was 66.1 % and implantation rate was 50.9 %. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 56.8 % and the rates for singleton and twin pregnancies were 53.7 % and 44.8 %. Of the 59 cycles in the vitrified-thawed group, 111 blastocysts were transferred. The clinical pregnancy rate was 59.3 % and implantation rate was 43.2 %. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 47.5 % and the rates for singleton and twin pregnancies were 60.7 % and 39.3 %. The clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy rate did not differ significantly between the two groups. The implantation rates were not significantly different between the fresh and the vitrified-thawed groups. Thus, single embryo transfer may be considered in fresh cycles to decrease multiple pregnancy rates. The surplus embryos should be vitrified for the frozen embryo transfer to improve the cumulative pregnancy rate.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectVitrificationen_US
dc.subjectBlastocysten_US
dc.subjectImplantationen_US
dc.subjectPregnancyen_US
dc.titleComparison of the clinical outcomes between fresh blastocyst and vitrified-thawed blastocyst transferen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10815-012-9874-zen_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICSen_US
dc.citation.volume29en_US
dc.citation.issue12en_US
dc.citation.spage1353en_US
dc.citation.epage1356en_US
dc.contributor.department生物科技學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Biological Science and Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000312783100006-
dc.citation.woscount6-
Appears in Collections:Articles


Files in This Item:

  1. 000312783100006.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.