完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorLin, Jo-Wangen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:37:25Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:37:25Z-
dc.date.issued2007-09-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0925-8558en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10831-007-9013-5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/25731-
dc.description.abstractThis paper argues that the most recent analyses of guo as proposed in Pan and Lee [(2004). The role of pragmatics in interpreting the Chinese perfective markers -Guo and -Le. Journal of Pragmatics, 36,441-446] and Lin [(2006). Time in a language without tense: The case of Chinese. Journal of Semantics, 23, 1-53] still fail to explain the predicate restriction and the discontinuity property of guo in a satisfying manner. An alternative analysis, which is a more fine-grained version of Lin's (2006) proposal, is suggested. It is proposed that a sentence with the form guo(P) is true in a world w if and only if the run time of the internal stage of an event described by P is wholly before the speech time, and if the event e has a target state, then there is an inertia world W-inr stretching from w such that another event e' described also by P but distinct from e true in it at an interval containing the speech time.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectexperiential markeren_US
dc.subjectdiscontinuity effecten_US
dc.subjectmeaning of guoen_US
dc.titlePredicate restriction, discontinuity property and the meaning of the perfective marker Guo in Mandarin Chineseen_US
dc.typeArticle; Proceedings Paperen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10831-007-9013-5en_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF EAST ASIAN LINGUISTICSen_US
dc.citation.volume16en_US
dc.citation.issue3en_US
dc.citation.spage237en_US
dc.citation.epage257en_US
dc.contributor.department外國語文學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Foreign Languages and Literaturesen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000248865700004-
顯示於類別:會議論文


文件中的檔案:

  1. 000248865700004.pdf

若為 zip 檔案,請下載檔案解壓縮後,用瀏覽器開啟資料夾中的 index.html 瀏覽全文。