完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hwang, FK | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-08T15:40:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-08T15:40:38Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2003-07-06 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0012-365X | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0012-365X(03)00034-7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11536/27722 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We show that Macula's claim of a Hamming distance 4 between any two candidate sets of positive clones in his pool design is incorrect. However, a previous proof of his on a weaker result (with a condition on design parameters) is correct. We also show that the condition is sharp and the distance 4 result is also sharp for arbitrary parameter values. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | pooling designs | en_US |
dc.subject | group testing | en_US |
dc.subject | error-correcting | en_US |
dc.subject | disjunct matrix | en_US |
dc.title | On Macula's error-correcting pool designs | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/S0012-365X(03)00034-7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.journal | DISCRETE MATHEMATICS | en_US |
dc.citation.volume | 268 | en_US |
dc.citation.issue | 1-3 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 311 | en_US |
dc.citation.epage | 314 | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | 應用數學系 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Applied Mathematics | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosnumber | WOS:000183742600024 | - |
dc.citation.woscount | 3 | - |
顯示於類別: | 期刊論文 |