Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTsai, CCen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, CMen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:41:58Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:41:58Z-
dc.date.issued2002-09-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0021-9266en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/28541-
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding how people think and how people organise knowledge are always major concerns for educational researchers. Hence, educators have developed various ways of representing learners' 'cognitive structures'. This article provides a review of the use of five methods of representing cognitive structures-free word association, controlled word association, tree construction, concept map and flow map. Through comparing the types of analyses that are generated from these cognitive structure representation methods, this paper discusses the applications, as well as the limitations, among these methods.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectcognitive structureen_US
dc.subjectconstructivismen_US
dc.subjectassessmenten_US
dc.subjectconcept mapen_US
dc.subjectflow mapen_US
dc.titleExploring students' cognitive structures in learning science: a review of relevant methodsen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL EDUCATIONen_US
dc.citation.volume36en_US
dc.citation.issue4en_US
dc.citation.spage163en_US
dc.citation.epage169en_US
dc.contributor.department教育研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Educationen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000178179700003-
dc.citation.woscount17-
Appears in Collections:Articles


Files in This Item:

  1. 000178179700003.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.