Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tsai, CC | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Huang, CM | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-08T15:41:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-08T15:41:58Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2002-09-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0021-9266 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11536/28541 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Understanding how people think and how people organise knowledge are always major concerns for educational researchers. Hence, educators have developed various ways of representing learners' 'cognitive structures'. This article provides a review of the use of five methods of representing cognitive structures-free word association, controlled word association, tree construction, concept map and flow map. Through comparing the types of analyses that are generated from these cognitive structure representation methods, this paper discusses the applications, as well as the limitations, among these methods. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | cognitive structure | en_US |
dc.subject | constructivism | en_US |
dc.subject | assessment | en_US |
dc.subject | concept map | en_US |
dc.subject | flow map | en_US |
dc.title | Exploring students' cognitive structures in learning science: a review of relevant methods | en_US |
dc.type | Review | en_US |
dc.identifier.journal | JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL EDUCATION | en_US |
dc.citation.volume | 36 | en_US |
dc.citation.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 163 | en_US |
dc.citation.epage | 169 | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | 教育研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.department | Institute of Education | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosnumber | WOS:000178179700003 | - |
dc.citation.woscount | 17 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Articles |
Files in This Item:
If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.