完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorTsai, CJen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, CHen_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, SHen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:43:45Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:43:45Z-
dc.date.issued2001-06-15en_US
dc.identifier.issn0013-936Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es001943zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/29569-
dc.description.abstractThis paper compares the collection efficiency and capacity of a coated porous metal disk with those of a silica gel tube and an impinger at the acid or basic aerosol concentration of two times the permissible exposure limitation (Taiwan IOSH, Institute of Occupational Safety and Health), relative humidity of 80 +/- 5%, and temperature of 30 +/- 3 degreesC in the laboratory. Using 5% sodium carbonate/glycerin coating, the collection efficiencies of the porous metal disk for nitric acid, hydrogen chloride, and hydrogen fluoride are found to be higher than those of the silica gel tube and the impinger when the sampling time is less than 3.0 h. The gas collection capacity of the porous metal disk coated with 5% sodium carbonate is calculated to be 3.9, 5.8, and >2.5 mg for nitric acid, hydrogen chloride, and hydrogen fluoride, respectively. For ammonia, the porous metal disk coated using 4% citric acid performs slightly better than the impinger, and the corresponding capacity is slightly greater than 33.6 mg.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleCollection efficiency and capacity of three samplers for acidic and basic gasesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/es001943zen_US
dc.identifier.journalENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGYen_US
dc.citation.volume35en_US
dc.citation.issue12en_US
dc.citation.spage2572en_US
dc.citation.epage2575en_US
dc.contributor.department環境工程研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000169343700027-
dc.citation.woscount18-
顯示於類別:期刊論文


文件中的檔案:

  1. 000169343700027.pdf

若為 zip 檔案,請下載檔案解壓縮後,用瀏覽器開啟資料夾中的 index.html 瀏覽全文。