完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorHsu, BMen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, CPen_US
dc.contributor.authorHsu, YFen_US
dc.contributor.authorJiang, GYen_US
dc.contributor.authorHsu, CLLen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:44:14Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:44:14Z-
dc.date.issued2001-02-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0043-1354en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00291-8en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/29873-
dc.description.abstractThe cartridge filtration method and membrane filtration method based on the fluorescent antibody procedure were evaluated for their recovery efficiencies and detection limits of Giardia and Cryptosporidium. We assessed the performances of the two concentration methods for water samples collected from Taiwan water treatment plants. The membrane filtration method was characterized by higher recovery rate and detection limit comparing with the cartridge filtration method. The occurrences of both parasites, and the relationships of parasite concentrations with indicator microorganisms show inconsistency between the two methods. It was discovered that water turbidity reduced the recovery efficiencies, and raised the detection limits for both parasites regardless of the method used. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectGiardiaen_US
dc.subjectCryptosporidiumen_US
dc.subjectwater treatmenten_US
dc.subjectICRen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of two concentration methods for detecting Giardia and Cryptosporidium in wateren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00291-8en_US
dc.identifier.journalWATER RESEARCHen_US
dc.citation.volume35en_US
dc.citation.issue2en_US
dc.citation.spage419en_US
dc.citation.epage424en_US
dc.contributor.department環境工程研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000166466700010-
dc.citation.woscount20-
顯示於類別:期刊論文


文件中的檔案:

  1. 000166466700010.pdf

若為 zip 檔案,請下載檔案解壓縮後,用瀏覽器開啟資料夾中的 index.html 瀏覽全文。