Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYEH, KCen_US
dc.contributor.authorTUNG, YKen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:04:39Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:04:39Z-
dc.date.issued1993-02-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0733-9429en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/3137-
dc.description.abstractSand and gravel mining from a river bed results in irregular pits on the river bed. The migration of the pits might potentially threaten the safety of downstream bridge piers and other in-stream hydraulic structures. Models were developed to simulate the movement of pits for predicting the effect of migrating pits on in-stream structures. In view of random characteristics inherently residing in hydraulic and hydrologic processes, it is essential for an engineer to assess the overall uncertainty features of a hydraulic model output subjected to its stochastic input parameters. As an illustration, this paper analyzes the uncertainties of a pit migration model recently proposed by Lee et al. (1990) using three methods including the first-order variance estimation method, point estimation technique, and Latin hypercubic sampling. Comparisons of merits and limitations of these methods are also made.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleUNCERTAINTY AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSES OF PIT-MIGRATION MODELen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCEen_US
dc.citation.volume119en_US
dc.citation.issue2en_US
dc.citation.spage262en_US
dc.citation.epage283en_US
dc.contributor.department土木工程學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Civil Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:A1993KL46800008-
dc.citation.woscount40-
Appears in Collections:Articles


Files in This Item:

  1. A1993KL46800008.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.