Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, Cheryl Chia-Huien_US
dc.contributor.authorChang, Yue-Cuneen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Guan-Huaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeng, Jui-Huaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTseng, Chien-Ningen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:48:22Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:48:22Z-
dc.date.issued2010-09-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0309-2402en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05382.xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/32215-
dc.description.abstractP>Aim. This paper is a report of a study conducted to determine the prevalence and predictors of persistent and transient cognitive decline in older hospitalized patients over 6 months after hospital discharge. Background. Cognitive decline occurs in 16-35 center dot 5% of older hospitalized patients, but this decline may be persistent rather than transient. Distinguishing persistent from transient cognitive decline is clinically useful. Methods. For this prospective cohort study, 291 older patients were recruited from five medical and surgical units at a tertiary medical centre in Taiwan between 2004 and 2006. Participants were assessed for cognitive status by scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination at admission, discharge, 3 and 6 months postdischarge. Persistent cognitive decline was defined as continuing score reduction and >= 3-point reduction 6 months postdischarge. Transient decline was defined as >= 3-point reduction at some stage, with a total decline < 3 points 6 months postdischarge. Findings. The cognitive status of the majority of participants (57 center dot 4%, n = 167) decreased >= 3 points during follow-up. Of these decliners, 59 (35 center dot 3%) had persistent cognitive decline, with an average 5 center dot 32-point reduction 6 months postdischarge. Forty-six (27 center dot 5%) participants experienced transient cognitive decline. After multiple adjustments in logistic regression analysis, persistent decline was predicted by no in-hospital functional decline (OR = 0 center dot 16, P = 0 center dot 002), more re-admissions after discharge (OR = 2 center dot 42, P = 0 center dot 020), and older age (OR = 1 center dot 09, P = 0 center dot 048). Conclusion. A new perspective is needed on discharge planning on patients at risk for persistent cognitive decline. Nurses can oversee the delivery of care, identify cognitive decline, refer patients, and educate families on strategies to enhance cognitive functioning for their aging relatives.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectacute careen_US
dc.subjectcognitive declineen_US
dc.subjectcognitive impairmenten_US
dc.subjectnursingen_US
dc.subjectolder hospitalized peopleen_US
dc.titlePersistent cognitive decline in older hospitalized patients in Taiwanen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05382.xen_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSINGen_US
dc.citation.volume66en_US
dc.citation.issue9en_US
dc.citation.spage1991en_US
dc.citation.epage2001en_US
dc.contributor.department統計學研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Statisticsen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000280664200010-
dc.citation.woscount2-
Appears in Collections:Articles


Files in This Item:

  1. 000280664200010.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.