完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.author劉俞伶en_US
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yu-Lingen_US
dc.contributor.author洪志真en_US
dc.contributor.authorHorng, Jyh-Jen Shiauen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-12T01:57:59Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-12T01:57:59Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://140.113.39.130/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#GT079926502en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/49914-
dc.description.abstract近年來以統計觀點來監控製程或產品剖面資料的研究已有廣泛發展,大多數 的研究皆針對一維剖面提出第一階段或第二階段監控策略。本篇文章是針對二維 剖面並納入剖面與剖面之間的變異,運用PCA 及MPCA 提出第二階段的監控策 略。對於運用PCA 方面,將二維剖面矩陣的行向量拉成一維向量,並利用主成 分分析的方法來分析此一維向量的共變異結構,進而對主成分投影量 (principalcomponent scores) 提出監控策略。對於運用MPCA 方面,先利用Ye (2005) 提出的演算法來找尋分別為行方向和列方向的兩個基底矩陣,然後將新進的二維剖面同時對這兩個基底矩陣投影而獲得座標矩陣 (coordinatematrix) ,進而對座標矩陣提出監控策略。兩方法皆採用常見的Hotelling T 2管制圖來確認製程穩定性。評估兩種方法之績效的方式則是利用平均連串長度來比較偵測能力;整體而言,MPCA 表現較PCA 來得好,且在執行時間方面,MPCA 較不會受到維度增大的影響。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe study of monitoring process or product profiles by means of statistics already has extensive development. Most research works focus on one-dimensional profile monitoring schemes of Phase I or Phase II. This thesis is directed towards two-dimensional profiles with profile-to-profile variation. We utilize principal component analysis (PCA) and multilinear principal component analysis (MPCA) to propose monitoring schemes of Phase II. Since two-dimensional profile data are represented as matrices, we vectorize these matrix data for PCA to analyze the covariance structure of the resulting one-dimensional vectors. With that, we propose a control chart based on principal component scores. For using MPCA, we first utilize the algorithm proposed by Ye (2005) to search for two basis matrices, one for columns and one for rows, and then project an incoming two-dimensional profile onto the two basis matrices simultaneously to obtain a score matrix. We construct a monitoring scheme based on this score matrix. Both control charts use the Hotelling’s T 2 statistic to monitor the stability of the process.The performances of the two methods are evaluated and compared in terms of the average run length. Generally, MPCA performs better than PCA. Moreover, for the execution time, the MPCA method is not affected as much as the PCA method when the size of the profile matrix increases.en_US
dc.language.isozh_TWen_US
dc.subject二維剖面監控zh_TW
dc.subject剖面與剖面之間的變異zh_TW
dc.subject平均連串長度zh_TW
dc.subject主成分分析zh_TW
dc.subject多線性主成分分析zh_TW
dc.subjectTwo-dimensional Profile Monitoringen_US
dc.subjectProfile-to-Profile Variationen_US
dc.subjectAverage Run Lengthen_US
dc.subjectPrincipal Component Analysisen_US
dc.subjectMultilinear Principal Component Analysisen_US
dc.title第二階段二維剖面監控之研究zh_TW
dc.titleA Study on Phase II Two-dimensional Profile Monitoringen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.department統計學研究所zh_TW
顯示於類別:畢業論文


文件中的檔案:

  1. 650202.pdf

若為 zip 檔案,請下載檔案解壓縮後,用瀏覽器開啟資料夾中的 index.html 瀏覽全文。