Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYang, Kai-Shingen_US
dc.contributor.authorJhong, Jhih-Haoen_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Yur-Tsaien_US
dc.contributor.authorChien, Kuo-Hsiangen_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Chi-Chuanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:06:47Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:06:47Z-
dc.date.issued2010-06-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1521-3331en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCAPT.2010.2044412en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/5330-
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the airside performance of heat sinks having fin patterns of delta, semi-circular vortex generators, plain fin and their combinations. Test results indicate that the heat transfer performance is strongly related to the developing and fully developed flow characteristics. The augmentations via vortex generator are relatively effective when the flow is in the developing region whereas they become quite less effective in the fully developed region. This is especially pronounced when the fin pitch is small or operated at a lower frontal velocity. Actually, the plain fin geometry outperforms most of the fin patterns at the fully developed region. This is because a close spacing prevented the formation of vortex, and the presence of interrupted surface may also suffer from the degradation by constriction of conduction path. The results suggest that the vortex generators operated at a higher frontal velocity and at a larger fin pitch are more beneficial than that of plain fin geometry. The semi-circular vortex generator possesses the highest heat transfer coefficients and pressure drops at developing region, suggesting the mechanism of blockage of conduction path cannot be overlooked. The performance of dense or loose vortex generator is moderate either in a developing or fully developed region. In association with the VG-1 criteria (same pumping power and same heat transfer capacity), the asymmetric design (VG+plain) reveals the best results. The design could reduce 31.1% required heat dissipation area at a frontal velocity of 5 m/s within a developing region. Yet, it is still applicable in a fully developed region with an area reduction of 1.8-11.5% at a frontal velocity 3-5 m/s.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectFully developeden_US
dc.subjectheat sinken_US
dc.subjectplainen_US
dc.subjectvortex generatoren_US
dc.titleOn the Heat Transfer Characteristics of Heat Sinks: With and Without Vortex Generatorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TCAPT.2010.2044412en_US
dc.identifier.journalIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPONENTS AND PACKAGING TECHNOLOGIESen_US
dc.citation.volume33en_US
dc.citation.issue2en_US
dc.citation.spage391en_US
dc.citation.epage397en_US
dc.contributor.department機械工程學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000281779500015-
dc.citation.woscount4-
Appears in Collections:Articles


Files in This Item:

  1. 000281779500015.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.