完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorHu, J-Len_US
dc.contributor.authorFang, C-Yen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:07:04Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:07:04Z-
dc.date.issued2010-04-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0160-5682en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jors.2009.11en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/5537-
dc.description.abstractCurrent studies that use traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) neglect the 100% market share restriction. This study adopts zero-sum gains data envelopment analysis to measure the efficiency scores of securities firms (SFs) and indicates that the traditional DEA model underestimates the efficiency scores of inefficient SFs. This research analyses 266 integrated securities firms in Taiwan from 2001 to 2005 and employs three inputs (fixed assets, financial capital, and general expenses) and a single output (market share). The foreign-affiliated ownership of SFs positively affects the efficiency scores. The two-stage least squares procedure confirms that the market share and efficiency score simultaneously reinforce each other. Journal of the Operational Research Society (2010) 61, 647-657. doi: 10.1057/jors.2009.11 Published online 18 March 2009en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectzero-sum gains data envelopment analysis (ZSG-DEA)en_US
dc.subjectpanel dataen_US
dc.subjecttwo-stage least squares procedure (2SLS)en_US
dc.titleDo market share and efficiency matter for each other? An application of the zero-sum gains data envelopment analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1057/jors.2009.11en_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETYen_US
dc.citation.volume61en_US
dc.citation.issue4en_US
dc.citation.spage647en_US
dc.citation.epage657en_US
dc.contributor.department經營管理研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Business and Managementen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000275445300012-
dc.citation.woscount1-
顯示於類別:期刊論文


文件中的檔案:

  1. 000275445300012.pdf

若為 zip 檔案,請下載檔案解壓縮後,用瀏覽器開啟資料夾中的 index.html 瀏覽全文。