Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, Hsueh-Yingen_US
dc.contributor.authorLien, Chien-Yuen_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Wei-Yenen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Yuan T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Jim J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:09:28Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:09:28Z-
dc.date.issued2009-05-08en_US
dc.identifier.issn0036-8075en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1171305en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/7238-
dc.description.abstractRecently, discrepancies in laboratory measurements of chlorine peroxide (ClOOCl) absorption cross sections have cast doubt on the validity of current photochemical models for stratospheric ozone degradation. Whereas previous ClOOCl absorption measurements all suffered from uncertainties due to absorption by impurities, we demonstrate here a method that uses mass-selected detection to circumvent such interference. The cross sections of ClOOCl were determined at two critical wavelengths (351 and 308 nanometers). Our results are sufficient to resolve the controversial issue originating from the ClOOCl laboratory cross sections and suggest that the highest laboratory estimates for atmospheric photolysis rates of ClOOCl, which best explain the field measurements via current chemical models, are reasonable.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleUV Absorption Cross Sections of ClOOCl Are Consistent with Ozone Degradation Modelsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1126/science.1171305en_US
dc.identifier.journalSCIENCEen_US
dc.citation.volume324en_US
dc.citation.issue5928en_US
dc.citation.spage781en_US
dc.citation.epage784en_US
dc.contributor.department應用化學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Applied Chemistryen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000265832400045-
dc.citation.woscount30-
Appears in Collections:Articles


Files in This Item:

  1. 000265832400045.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.