QA document recommendations for communities of question-answering websites

dc.citation.epage160en_US
dc.citation.issueen_US
dc.citation.spage146en_US
dc.citation.volume57en_US
dc.citation.woscount0
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Duen-Renen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yu-Hsuanen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Chun-Kaien_US
dc.contributor.department資訊管理與財務金融系 註:原資管所+財金所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Information Management and Financeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:35:04Z
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:35:04Z
dc.date.issued2014-02-01en_US
dc.description.abstractWith the rapid development of Internet and Web 2.0 technology, Question & Answering (Q&A) websites have become an essential knowledge-sharing platform. This platform provides knowledge community services where users with common interests or expertise can form a knowledge community. Community members can collect and share QA knowledge (documents) regarding their interests. However, due to the massive amount of QAs created every day, information overload can become a major problem. Consequently, a recommendation mechanism is needed to recommend QA documents for communities of Q&A websites. Existing studies did not investigate the recommendation mechanisms for knowledge collections in communities of Q&A Websites. Traditional recommendation methods use member importance as weight to consolidate individual profiles and generate group profiles, which in turn are used to filter out items of recommendation. However, they do not consider certain factors of the recommended items, such as the reputation of the community members and the complementary relationships between documents. In this work, we propose a novel method to recommend related QA documents for knowledge communities of Q&A websites. The proposed method recommends QA documents by considering factors such as the community members' reputation in collecting and answering QAs, the push scores and collection time of QAs, the complementary relationships between QAs and their relevance to the communities. This research evaluates and compares the proposed methods using an experimental dataset collected from Yahoo! Answers Taiwan website. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms other conventional methods, providing a more effective manner to recommend Q&A documents to knowledge communities. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.knosys.2013.12.017en_US
dc.identifier.issn0950-7051en_US
dc.identifier.journalKNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMSen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.12.017en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.lib.nycu.edu.tw/handle/11536/23805
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000331781300013
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge communityen_US
dc.subjectGroup recommendationen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge complementationen_US
dc.subjectQuestion-answering websitesen_US
dc.subjectLink analysisen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge reputationen_US
dc.titleQA document recommendations for communities of question-answering websitesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
000331781300013.pdf
Size:
785.32 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: