<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.cf390c6bfbe7555f.css"> Skip to main content

MicroPET reconstruction with random coincidence correction via a joint Poisson model

dc.citation.epage686en_US
dc.citation.issue6en_US
dc.citation.spage680en_US
dc.citation.volume30en_US
dc.citation.woscount4
dc.contributor.authorChen, Tai-Beenen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Jyh-Chengen_US
dc.contributor.authorLu, Henry Horng-Shingen_US
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Ren-Shyanen_US
dc.contributor.department統計學研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Statisticsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:11:16Z
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:11:16Z
dc.date.issued2008-07-01en_US
dc.description.abstractPositron emission tomography (PET) can provide in vivo, quantitative and functional information for diagnosis; however, PET image quality depends highly on a reconstruction algorithm. Iterative algorithms, such as the maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) algorithm, are rapidly becoming the standards for image reconstruction in emission-computed tomography. The conventional MLEM algorithm utilized the Poisson model in its system matrix, which is no longer valid for delay-subtraction of randomly corrected data. The aim of this study is to overcome this problem. The maximum likelihood estimation using the expectation maximum algorithm (MLE-EM) is adopted and modified to reconstruct microPET images using random correction from joint prompt and delay sinograms; this reconstruction method is called PDEM. The proposed joint Poisson model preserves Poisson properties without increasing the variance (noise) associated with random correction. The work here is an initial application/demonstration without applied normalization, scattering. attenuation, and arc correction. The coefficients of variation (CV) and full width at half-maximum (FWHM) values were utilized to compare the quality of reconstructed microPET images of physical phantoms acquired by filtered backprojection (FBP), ordered subsets-expected maximum (OSEM) and PDEM approaches. Experimental and simulated results demonstrate that the proposed PDEM produces better image quality than the FBP and OSEM approaches. (C) 2007 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.05.013en_US
dc.identifier.issn1350-4533en_US
dc.identifier.journalMEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICSen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.05.013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.lib.nycu.edu.tw/handle/11536/8640
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000258588700002
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectMLE-EWen_US
dc.subjectFBPen_US
dc.subjectOSEMen_US
dc.subjectPDEMen_US
dc.subjectFOREen_US
dc.subjectCVen_US
dc.subjectFWHMen_US
dc.titleMicroPET reconstruction with random coincidence correction via a joint Poisson modelen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
000258588700002.pdf
Size:
671.62 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: