<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.cf390c6bfbe7555f.css"> Skip to main content

Multiobjective planning of surface water resources by multiobjective genetic algorithm with constrained differential dynamic programming

dc.citation.epage508en_US
dc.citation.issue6en_US
dc.citation.spage499en_US
dc.citation.volume133en_US
dc.citation.woscount12
dc.contributor.authorYang, Chao-Chungen_US
dc.contributor.authorChang, Liang-Chengen_US
dc.contributor.authorYeh, Chao-Hsienen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Chang-Shianen_US
dc.contributor.department土木工程學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Civil Engineeringen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:13:12Z
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:13:12Z
dc.date.issued2007-11-01en_US
dc.description.abstractOwing to the conflict encountered between the two objectives of fixed cost in reservoir installation and operating cost in time-varying water deficit, multiobjective planning of surface water resources is a difficult job. Instead of combining these two objectives into just one objective using the weighting factor approach, this investigation proposes a novel method by integrating a multiobjective genetic algorithm (MOGA) with constrained differential dynamic programming (CDDP). A MOGA is employed to generate the various combinations of reservoir capacity and estimate the noninferior solution set. However, applying this algorithm to solve the dynamics of the operating cost, the number of variables increasing with time will dramatically increase the use of computational resources. Consequently, the CDDP is herein adopted to distribute optimal releases among reservoirs to satisfy water demand as much as possible. Next, the effectiveness of the proposed methodology is verified by solving a multiobjective planning problem of surface water in southern Taiwan. This real application demonstrates that MOGA can be linked with CDDP to resolve a complex water resources problem. Additionally, the ability of MOGA on addressing multiple objectives simultaneously without converting to a weighted objective function provides the opportunity for significant advancement in multiobjective optimization. Finally, this investigation also proposes three suitable strategies of reservoir construction to decision makers With budget concerns through the analysis of all noninferior solutions.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2007)133:6(499)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0733-9496en_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCEen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2007)133:6(499)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.lib.nycu.edu.tw/handle/11536/10195
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000250317800004
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleMultiobjective planning of surface water resources by multiobjective genetic algorithm with constrained differential dynamic programmingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
000250317800004.pdf
Size:
648.38 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: