<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.cf390c6bfbe7555f.css"> Skip to main content

Mining the R&D innovation performance processes for high-tech firms based on rough set theory

dc.citation.epage458en_US
dc.citation.issue7-8en_US
dc.citation.spage447en_US
dc.citation.volume30en_US
dc.citation.woscount11
dc.contributor.authorWang, Chun-Hsienen_US
dc.contributor.authorChin, Yang-Chiehen_US
dc.contributor.authorTzeng, Gwo-Hshiungen_US
dc.contributor.department管理科學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.department科技管理研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Management Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Management of Technologyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:06:39Z
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:06:39Z
dc.date.issued2010-07-01en_US
dc.description.abstractThe research and development (R&D) innovation of firms continues to be viewed as an important source of competitive advantage to academics and practitioners. To explore and extract the R&D innovation decision rules, it is important to understand how the R&D innovation rule-base works. However, many studies have not yet adequately induced and extracted the decision rule of R&D innovation and performance based on the characteristics and components of the original data rather than on post-determination models. The analysis of this study is grounded in the taxonomy of induction-related activities using a rough set theory approach or rule-based decision-making technique to infer R&D innovation decision rules and models linking R&D innovation to sales growth. The rules developed using rough set theory can be directly translated into a path-dependent flow network to infer decision paths and parameters. The flow network graph and cause-and-effect relationship of decision rules are heavily exploited in R&D innovation characteristics. In addition, an empirical case of R&D innovation performance will be illustrated to show that the rough sets model and the flow network graph are useful and efficient tools for building R&D innovation decision rules and providing predictions. We will then illustrate that integrating the flow network graph with rough set theory can fully reflect the characteristics of R&D innovation, and, through the established model, we can obtain a more reasonable result than with artificial influence. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.technovation.2009.11.001en_US
dc.identifier.issn0166-4972en_US
dc.identifier.journalTECHNOVATIONen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.11.001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.lib.nycu.edu.tw/handle/11536/5204
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000279235400007
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectR&D innovationen_US
dc.subjectRule inductionen_US
dc.subjectCause-and-effect relationshipen_US
dc.subjectRough set theoryen_US
dc.subjectFlow network graphen_US
dc.titleMining the R&D innovation performance processes for high-tech firms based on rough set theoryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
000279235400007.pdf
Size:
296.1 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: