Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHsu, C. -L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, F. -J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:13:19Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:13:19Z-
dc.date.issued2007-10-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1751-8806en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-sen:20070002en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/10291-
dc.description.abstractAlthough many workflow models have been proposed, analyses on artifacts are seldom discussed. A workflow application with well structured and adequate resources may still fail or yield unexpected results in execution due to inaccurate artifact manipulation, for example, inconsistency between data flow and control flow, or contradictions between artifact operations. Thus, artifact analysis is very important since activities cannot be executed properly without accurate information. This paper presents a three-layer workflow model for designing a workflow and characterises the behaviour of an artifact by its state transition diagram. By abstracting common usages of artifacts, six types of inaccurate artifact usage affecting workflow execution are identified and a set of algorithms to detect these inaccurate usages in workflow specifications is presented. An example is demonstrated and then related works are compared.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleAnalysing inaccurate artifact usages in workflow specificationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1049/iet-sen:20070002en_US
dc.identifier.journalIET SOFTWAREen_US
dc.citation.volume1en_US
dc.citation.issue5en_US
dc.citation.spage188en_US
dc.citation.epage205en_US
dc.contributor.department資訊工程學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Computer Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000251677100004-
dc.citation.woscount3-
Appears in Collections:Articles


Files in This Item:

  1. 000251677100004.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.