完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.author張啟聰en_US
dc.contributor.authorChang, Chi-tsungen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-19T03:51:14Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-19T03:51:14Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.issn1811-3095en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/107667-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.itl.nctu.edu.tw/tlr_n/ch/list5_1.htmlen_US
dc.description.abstract專利要件在專利法中極為重要,此為專利制度的核心之一,因為其涉及專利之取得,即使在取得專利權之後,要行使專利權時,被控侵權人亦有可能主張專利要件不具備而遭認定專利權無效。專利要件中又以非顯而易知性最為困難,其不確定性最高。最近美國最高法院出現了有關非顯而易知性之KSR案件,有人稱該案為近年來最重要的專利法案件,因為其影響整個專利制度。KSR案件主要在探討Graham案及TSM法則,TSM法則的意義為何,TSM法則在實務上有何問題,KSR案件的主要內容為何,為何KSR案要探討TSM法則,KSR案代表之意義為何,KSR案之後實務上運作情形又如何,是本文探討之重點。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractPatentability, as one of the fundamental elements of the patent system, is essential in the patent law. Patentability determines not only if a patent should be granted or not, but also a patent's validity when an infringement claim is brought up. Among the benchmarks for determining the patentability, non-obviousness is considered the most intriguing and uncertain issue. The decision of the US Supreme Court in KSR Infernational Co. v. Teleflex Inc. (KSR.), which concerns non-obviousness, is said to be the landmark case in US patent law over the past few years. This case revisited the principles developed in Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas City, and the so-called Teaching, Suggestion, and Motivation (TSM) rules. In the following essay, I will first pursue what TSM rules connote, and what issues the application of TSM rules ahs created in the legal practice. Then I will look into the KSR and the connections between TSM rules and the KSR. Finally, I will try to explain the indications of the KSR, and its impacts on the legal practice.en_US
dc.subject專利zh_TW
dc.subject非顯而易知性zh_TW
dc.subject非顯著性zh_TW
dc.subject進步性zh_TW
dc.subjectPatentzh_TW
dc.subjectNon-obviousnesszh_TW
dc.subjectKSRzh_TW
dc.subjectTSMzh_TW
dc.subjectTeaching-suggestion-motivationzh_TW
dc.titleKSR案及其對美國專利實務造成之影響zh_TW
dc.identifier.journal科技法學評論zh_TW
dc.citation.volume5en_US
dc.citation.issue1en_US
dc.citation.spage225en_US
dc.citation.epage256en_US
dc.contributor.department科技法律研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Technology Lawen_US
顯示於類別:交大法學評論


文件中的檔案:

  1. 5_1_3.pdf

若為 zip 檔案,請下載檔案解壓縮後,用瀏覽器開啟資料夾中的 index.html 瀏覽全文。