Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, Hung-Mingen_US
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Bo-Fuen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Hui-Lingen_US
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Shiow-Fenen_US
dc.contributor.authorHo, Shinn-Yingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:14:52Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:14:52Z-
dc.date.issued2007-01-30en_US
dc.identifier.issn0192-8651en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20542en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/11214-
dc.description.abstractProtein-ligand docking can be formulated as a parameter optimization problem associated with an accurate scoring function, which aims to identify the translation, orientation, and conformation of a docked ligand with the lowest energy. The parameter optimization problem for highly flexible ligands with many rotatable bonds is more difficult than that for less flexible ligands using genetic algorithm (GA)-based approaches, due to the large numbers of parameters and high correlations among these parameters. This investigation presents a novel optimization algorithm SODOCK based on particle swarm optimization (PSO) for solving flexible protein-ligand docking problems. To improve efficiency and robustness of PSO, an efficient local search strategy is incorporated into SODOCK. The implementation of SODOCK adopts the environment and energy function of AutoDock 3.05. Computer simulation results reveal that SODOCK is superior to the Lamarckian genetic algorithm (LGA) of AutoDock. in terms of convergence performance, robustness, and obtained energy, especially for highly flexible ligands. The results also reveal that PSO is more suitable than the conventional GA in dealing with flexible docking problems with high correlations among parameters. This investigation also compared SODOCK with four state-of-the-art docking methods, namely GOLD 1.2, DOCK 4.0, FlexX 1.8, and LGA of AutoDock 3.05. SODOCK obtained the smallest RMSD in 19 of 37 cases. The average 2.29 angstrom of the 37 RMSD values of SODOCK was better than those of other docking programs, which were all above 3.0 angstrom. (C) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectflexible dockingen_US
dc.subjectscoring functionen_US
dc.subjectgenetic algorithmen_US
dc.subjectparticle swarm optimizationen_US
dc.subjectlocal searchen_US
dc.titleSODOCK: Swarm optimization for highly flexible protein-ligand dockingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jcc.20542en_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRYen_US
dc.citation.volume28en_US
dc.citation.issue2en_US
dc.citation.spage612en_US
dc.citation.epage623en_US
dc.contributor.department生物科技學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.department生物資訊及系統生物研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Biological Science and Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentInstitude of Bioinformatics and Systems Biologyen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000243238700017-
dc.citation.woscount49-
Appears in Collections:Articles


Files in This Item:

  1. 000243238700017.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.