完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Chi-Chuan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Kuan-Yu | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Liaw, Jane-Sunn | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tseng, Chih-Yung | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-07-21T08:29:44Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-07-21T08:29:44Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-01-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0017-9310 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.09.030 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11536/123855 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In this study, a comparative study of the airside performance of fin-and-tube heat exchangers having plain, louver, and semi-dimple vortex generator (VG) are made. A total of eighteen samples are made and tested with the corresponding fin pitch (F-p) being 1.6 mm and 2.0 mm and the number of tube row (N) are 1, 2 and 4, respectively. Test results indicate that the heat transfer coefficient for N = 1 for louver fin geometry with a smaller fin pitch of 1.6 mm is higher than that of semi-dimple VG and plain fin geometry. For N = 1 with a larger fin pitch of 2.0 mm, the semi-dimple VG is marginally higher than that of louver fin geometry when the frontal velocity is lower than 2 m s(-1). However, the trend is reversed where the heat transfer coefficient for louver fin outperforms that of semi-dimple VG when the velocity is increased further. For the airside performance for N = 2 or N = 4, the heat transfer coefficients for louver fin geometry is about 2-15% higher than those of semi-dimple geometry. The difference is increased with the rising velocity and the results prevail for both fin pitches. However, the difference is smaller at a larger fin pitch due to the comparatively effectively swirled motion of the semi-dimple VG. The effect of the number of tube row on the heat transfer coefficients is negligible for louver fin geometry and is also rather small for semi-dimple VG. For the plain fin geometry, the effect of tube row is also small when N > 1. The heat transfer performance for N = 1 is different from N = 2 or N = 4 due to its inline configuration. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Fin-and-tube heat exchanger | en_US |
dc.subject | Louver fin | en_US |
dc.subject | Vortex generator | en_US |
dc.title | An experimental study of the air-side performance of fin-and-tube heat exchangers having plain, louver, and semi-dimple vortex generator configuration | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.09.030 | en_US |
dc.identifier.journal | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER | en_US |
dc.citation.volume | 80 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 281 | en_US |
dc.citation.epage | 287 | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | 機械工程學系 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Mechanical Engineering | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosnumber | WOS:000345202100030 | en_US |
dc.citation.woscount | 0 | en_US |
顯示於類別: | 期刊論文 |