工程契約實務爭議問題研究

Abstract

工程之進行中，因其涉及許多專業人士，整合各種專業能力，合力完成一項成果，故而往往需花費大量時間、人力、資金、空間，始能成就。正因耗費龐大，當事人間為求謹慎，多簽訂工程契約，期待明確化雙方之權利與義務。 惟正因工程具有前述之高度專業性、複雜性，以致其進行中或完成後，若有爭議發生，往往影響雙方當事人權益甚鉅，輕則工程無法順利成就，重則使定做人或承攬人傾家蕩產亦時有耳聞，實在不可不慎。 本文主要探討工程契約相關爭議，側重於實務問題研究，因此將以實務觀點出發，輔以學者相關文獻探討，試圖確實解決實務爭議，更甚者，期待能防免於未然。 本文之寫作方式是先以工程契約之性質探討出發，並舉出實務上較常見之工程契約類型，試圖依其性質分類；再討論工程契約之擔保，自履約擔保制度內涵與規範至擔保之種類，均以分析。接著臚列實務常見工程契約爭議類型，並加以研究工程保險，試著提出可能之解決辦法。最後，精選最高法院判決三則，以實際案例背景，觀察實務上法院的看法，並提出拙見供各界參考。

A research in traditional construction contract dispute such as Change the design, assessment testing pricing, changes in materials price index…etc. Which explore vague areas for a sub-contract, so this study the relevant literature as a theoretical basis, through a practical investigate ways to resolve the situation using the industry's nominated sub- contract and explore the use of experience on the industry's current issues , the results even provide a proactive actins on the sub-contractor aim to specified requirements of plant owner, normally construction quantity cognitive differences arising on derivative contract dispute , the relevant disputes can be cleared through regular or irregular lawsuit for a solution during the contact period or aftermath, which not only spending a large time, manpower, fund space until consensus to be reached. Finally, this study compiled through three cases of Supreme Judicial Court from the practical experience in the industry, raise the observation from the view of law, to provide a solution, proposal or humble opinion for all circles' reference.