都市更新爭議案例及對策研究

Abstract

都市更新條例從民國87年中央頒定實施以來期間歷經數次修正，再由地方政府也依據都市更新條例及細則各依權則制定自治法規，都市更新實施之目的為改善居住環境、提升房屋耐震力不足、解決消防安全設施老舊之問題，但因部份案例產生爭議，導致部份輿論對都更議題產生負面報導及參與都更民眾之疑義，致目前都市更新業務停滯或推動困難。 本研究在於都市更新爭議案例中研究整理及匯集問題，於文獻回顧時研究學習我國都市更新制度及其他有都市更新需求地區如香港、日本都市更新制度，經由都市更新爭議案例檢討整理並列出爭議案例之議題，再將爭議案例之議題探討於我國都更法令是否適宜，同樣爭議議題相較於香港及日本地區如何處理，經研究計畫整理綜合分析後提出爭議案件問題之建議及結論，期研究能為未來都市更新盡一份力，並希望都市更新實行更臻完善。

Urban renewal clause had been several revised since its first implement in 1998. And the ultimate goal of the urban renewal is to improve living quality, advance seismic force of buildings and to diminish some functionless fire facilities. But there are a lot of disputes in some cases, and it turns out that there are some negative reports and influences on it. Therefore the current renewal process are now being sluggish and deny, further more it is much harder to promote. In this study we focus on some controversial cases then we gather and sort out all the problems. We look back to all the documents and try to study our renewal process and system. Make compare to other countries who need urban renewal, such as Japan, Hong Kong, we take the pros and try to make improvement of our own. We try to look back and study all the cases and we line out all the problems within. After all we try to figure out rather the present urban renewal clause is suitable to our nation. And when the same issue occurs in other countries, how do they respond to that. Finally, through this study, hope we can analyze the problems and suggest a better idea to improve our living quality and make our world better.