完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorChiu, Junmaoen_US
dc.contributor.authorTsai, Kunchien_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-21T06:56:44Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-21T06:56:44Z-
dc.date.issued2017-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-0560en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2016.10.013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/133115-
dc.description.abstractUsing bank bailout and funding injection actions to measure government interventions, this study explores whether the announcements of these actions could improve equity liquidity in the subprime crisis period. Our empirical results show that funding injections and bailout actions can both improve equity liquidity and increase net buying pressure, especially for the Paulson plan and the rescue of AIG from bankruptcy. The funding injection actions can improve equity liquidity more significantly than bailout actions.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectBailouten_US
dc.subjectFunding injectionen_US
dc.subjectSub-prime crisisen_US
dc.subjectEquity liquidityen_US
dc.subjectFunding constraintsen_US
dc.titleGovernment interventions and equity liquidity in the sub-prime crisis period: Evidence from the ETF marketen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.iref.2016.10.013en_US
dc.identifier.journalINTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCEen_US
dc.citation.volume47en_US
dc.citation.spage128en_US
dc.citation.epage142en_US
dc.contributor.department資訊管理與財務金融系 註:原資管所+財金所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Information Management and Financeen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000391899900010en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文