Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChang, Ray-Yunen_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Yan-Shuen_US
dc.contributor.authorHu, Jin-Lien_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-21T06:55:50Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-21T06:55:50Z-
dc.date.issued2015-12en_US
dc.identifier.issn0004-900Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12052en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/133869-
dc.description.abstractThis paper studies the patent licensing decision of an insider patentee when two firms engage in a mixed (Cournot-Bertrand or Bertrand-Cournot) competition where one firm adopts the quantity strategy while the other uses the price strategy and vice versa. If either the fixed fee or royalty is applied, then the licensor prefers the fixed fee when the licensor takes the quantity strategy, while the licensee uses the price strategy (Cournot-Bertrand). If the two-part tariff is applied, then the two-part tariff is more likely to be adopted by the licensor under Cournot-Bertrand than under Bertrand-Cournot competition.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleMIXED COMPETITION AND PATENT LICENSINGen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1467-8454.12052en_US
dc.identifier.journalAUSTRALIAN ECONOMIC PAPERSen_US
dc.citation.volume54en_US
dc.citation.issue4en_US
dc.citation.spage229en_US
dc.citation.epage249en_US
dc.contributor.department交大名義發表zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentNational Chiao Tung Universityen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000368184900003en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles