标题: 智慧创作专用权之性质与使用伦理──给原创条例的几点建议
The Legal Character and Culturally Appropriate Practices of Traditional Indigenous Intellectual Creations—Suggestions for the Protection Act for the Traditional Intellectual Creations of Indigenous Peoples
作者: 林孟玲
Meng-Ling Lin
关键字: 原创条例;智慧创作专用权;智慧创作财产权;智慧创作人格权;智慧创作使用伦理;The Protection Act for the Traditional Intellectual Crea-tions of Indigenous Peoples;Indigenous Traditional In-tellectual Creation Exclusive Right;Traditional Intellectu-al Creation Economic Right;Traditional Intellectual Crea-tion Moral Right;Culturally Appropriate Practice of the Traditional Intellectual Creations
公开日期: 六月-2015
出版社: 交通大学科技法律研究所
Institute of Technology Law
摘要: 原住民族智慧创作保护条例的制定,对于保护原住民族的传统智慧创作、文化成果之表达有显着的贡献。原创条例虽然立法意旨甚佳,是专门为保护原住民族传统智慧创作所量身定作之立法,也注意到了原住民族智慧创作有别于着作权之概念,而做出调整。但是条例所用的权利保护概念,却仍沿用着作权之规定,是美中不足之处。例如:“智慧创作专用权”的内涵仍沿用着作权的权利概念“智慧创作财产权”与“智慧创作人格权”;如果对于智慧创作专用权造成侵害,智慧创作专用权人的救济管道与着作权受侵害的救济方式并无二致,包括:排除侵害请求权、请求防止侵害请求权、损害赔偿请求权、请求销毁侵害智慧创作之物。此外,原创条例并未提及使用原住民族之传统智慧创作时,不能违反原住民族传统价值等观念,有如进行关于原住民族的学术研究时,有特别应遵守的研究伦理。本文从智慧创作专用权性质之讨论出发,继而探讨智慧创作财产权与智慧创作人格权之内涵。举例说明基于部落习惯法而来的,智慧创作之使用所应注意之使用伦理后,最后亦根据部落习惯法,阐述现行智慧创作专用权之权利救济管道妥适性。本文之建议期使原创条例能真正落实其立法目的:保护原住民族传统智慧创作以及促进原住民族文化发展。
The enactment of the Protection Act for the Traditional Intellectual Crea-tions of Indigenous Peoples makes great contributions to the development and protection of indigenous traditional intellectual creations by adopting indige-nous legal concepts suitable to tribal culture. For example, it recognizes collec-tive rights to indigenous creations. Also, it recognizes that the period for legal protection of indigenous traditional intellectual creations as an exclusive right is permanent. However, concepts of traditional intellectual creation, economic right, moral right, and remedies in this act still derive from Copyright Law, and remain inadequate for proper adoption of indigenous tribal common law. Also, the Act does not refer to nor adopt culturally appropriate practices of tradi-tional intellectual creations, which is very important to indigenous peoples in order to prevent cultural appropriation, but also to foster respect between cul-tures. This article thus gives some examples to elaborate these significant con-cepts, including indigenous traditional intellectual creation exclusive rights, traditional intellectual creation economic right and moral rights, culturally ap-propriate practices regarding indigenous traditional intellectual creations, and culturally appropriate remedies when traditional intellectual creation exclusive rights are infringed. These suggestions should help to better protect and pro-mote indigenous traditional intellectual creations and cultures in appropriate fashion.
URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/181130952015061201005
https://lawreview.nctu.edu.tw/issues/
http://hdl.handle.net/11536/137021
ISSN: 1811-3095
DOI: 10.3966/181130952015061201005
期刊: 科技法学评论
Technology Law Review
Volume: 12
Issue: 1
起始页: 191
结束页: 227
显示于类别:Technology Law Review


文件中的档案:

  1. 1811-3095-141206.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.