完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Qen_US
dc.contributor.authorChi, Sen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:19:18Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:19:18Z-
dc.date.issued2005-05-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0020-1685en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10789-005-0166-1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/13793-
dc.description.abstractThis paper clarifies the controversial issue over 40 years between the quantum approach by Pekar and the phenomenological approach by Ginzburg about the exciton-polariton spatial dispersion theory. For an isotropic nongyrotropic medium, the analytical explicit function of the impermeability tensor eta(ij)(omega, (k) over right arrow) (the inverse of the permittivity tensor) is obtained from the anisotropic undamped-wave harmonic oscillator model. After expanding eta(ij)(omega, (k) over right arrow) with respect to small parameters within it rather than to wavevector (k) over right arrow, the approximate refractive indices can be determined from the eigenvalue equation. By this treatment, the phenomenological approach is proved to be the approximation of the quantum approach near the resonance frequency. The condition for the approximation is discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleDoes the phenomenological approach contradict the quantum theory of exciton-polariton spatial dispersion?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10789-005-0166-1en_US
dc.identifier.journalINORGANIC MATERIALSen_US
dc.citation.volume41en_US
dc.citation.issue5en_US
dc.citation.spage549en_US
dc.citation.epage554en_US
dc.contributor.department光電工程學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Photonicsen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000229551700018-
dc.citation.woscount2-
顯示於類別:期刊論文


文件中的檔案:

  1. 000229551700018.pdf

若為 zip 檔案,請下載檔案解壓縮後,用瀏覽器開啟資料夾中的 index.html 瀏覽全文。