Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShieh, Gwowenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:19:51Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:19:51Z-
dc.date.issued2010-11-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1554-351Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.906en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/14082-
dc.description.abstractThis article investigates some unfamiliar properties of the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient for the estimation of simple correlation coefficient. Although Pearson's r is biased, except for limited situations, and the minimum variance unbiased estimator has been proposed in the literature, researchers routinely employ the sample correlation coefficient in their practical applications, because of its simplicity and popularity. In order to support such practice, this study examines the mean squared errors of r and several prominent formulas. The results reveal specific situations in which the sample correlation coefficient performs better than the unbiased and nearly unbiased estimators, facilitating recommendation of r as an effect size index for the strength of linear association between two variables. In addition, related issues of estimating the squared simple correlation coefficient are also considered.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleEstimation of the simple correlation coefficienten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3758/BRM.42.4.906en_US
dc.identifier.journalBEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODSen_US
dc.citation.volume42en_US
dc.citation.issue4en_US
dc.citation.spage906en_US
dc.citation.epage917en_US
dc.contributor.department管理科學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Management Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000287537100002-
dc.citation.woscount1-
Appears in Collections:Articles


Files in This Item:

  1. 000287537100002.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.