Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRingmar, Eriken_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:20:12Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:20:12Z-
dc.date.issued2006-12-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0010-8367en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010836706069611en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/14346-
dc.description.abstractIn this article, I analyse the unexpected quarrels and strange new alliances that formed in response to the United States' decision to go to war against Iraq in the spring of 2003. Telling different stories about Iraq, about themselves and about the nature of world politics, decision-makers reached different, conflicting conclusions. As is the case with all stories, these accounts are best analysed with the help of literary theory. Pursuing such an investigation I find that the stories follow closely one or the other of four classical narrative types: romance, tragedy, comedy and satire. I explain the quarrels and strange new alliances as a problem of inter-textuality.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectemplotmenten_US
dc.subjectinter-textualityen_US
dc.subjectIraq Waren_US
dc.subjectnarrativeen_US
dc.titleInter-textual relations - The quarrel over the Iraq War as a conflict between narrative typesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0010836706069611en_US
dc.identifier.journalCOOPERATION AND CONFLICTen_US
dc.citation.volume41en_US
dc.citation.issue4en_US
dc.citation.spage403en_US
dc.citation.epage421en_US
dc.contributor.department社會與文化所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Social Research and Culture Studiesen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000242987000008-
dc.citation.woscount7-
Appears in Collections:Articles


Files in This Item:

  1. 000242987000008.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.