Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChung, Yi-Shihen_US
dc.contributor.authorChang, Chi-Yenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-21T05:53:32Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-21T05:53:32Z-
dc.date.issued2018-04-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1369-8478en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/144835-
dc.description.abstractPrevious studies have observed that pedestrians tend to select gaps of farther distances between vehicles when crossing roads; however, the causes were unclear. Such gaps may create dangerous illusions because a farther distance for a given pedestrian crossing time implies that a vehicle is actually traveling faster. This study aimed to identify the causes of this farther-and-safer illusion, especially concerning elderly pedestrians. In particular, we examined behavioral changes after the burden of estimating the time to arrival (TTA) of an approaching vehicle has been removed through the provision of a countdown. Repeated measures collected for 82 subjects were examined using multilevel generalized linear models. The analysis results indicated that on average, the countdown effectively enhanced gap selection safety in both young (20-45 years) and elderly (60 years and older) subjects; however, its effect on reducing the illusion was heterogeneous between and within subjects. Most elderly subjects were sufferers of the farther-and-safer illusion even when their HA estimation burden had been removed, implying that a decline in physical ability is not the primary cause of the illusion. Although the gap selection behaviors of young subjects were relatively modifiable, the behavioral changes sometimes led to a worse consequence, suggesting an incapability of properly using the countdown information. This study suggests that simply telling elderly pedestrians to recognize their age related function changes is insufficient for improving their safety; other countermeasures are also required. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectGap selectionen_US
dc.subjectElderly pedestrianen_US
dc.subjectHabitual responseen_US
dc.subjectMultilevel analysisen_US
dc.subjectCountdownen_US
dc.titleFarther and safer: An illusion engendered by incapability?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.020en_US
dc.identifier.journalTRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOURen_US
dc.citation.volume54en_US
dc.citation.spage110en_US
dc.citation.epage123en_US
dc.contributor.department運輸與物流管理系 註:原交通所+運管所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Transportation and Logistics Managementen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000429890400009en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles