完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorChen, Che-Minen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Han-Hsingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-02T06:00:55Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-02T06:00:55Z-
dc.date.issued2013-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1540-496Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X490106en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/147652-
dc.description.abstractThe authors' empirical results indicate that default risk has some power to explain equity returns on the Taiwanese stock market, but it does not contain other important price information uncorrelated with the prevailing three or four risk factor models. Furthermore, compared to the U.S. market, the timing of distress returns is different. The short-term return reversal in the first month is less pronounced for the return differential between portfolios having high and low default risk, but the reversal lingers for a longer period of time. Overall, the book-to-market ratio, rather than the liquidity effect, plays a crucial role in explaining the default risk in equity returns.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectbook-to-market effecten_US
dc.subjectdefault risken_US
dc.subjectliquidityen_US
dc.subjectMerton modelen_US
dc.subjectreturn reversalen_US
dc.titleDefault Risk, Liquidity Risk, and Equity Returns: Evidence from the Taiwan Marketen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2753/REE1540-496X490106en_US
dc.identifier.journalEMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADEen_US
dc.citation.volume49en_US
dc.citation.spage101en_US
dc.citation.epage129en_US
dc.contributor.department管理科學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.department資訊管理與財務金融系 註:原資管所+財金所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Management Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Information Management and Financeen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000319525300007en_US
dc.citation.woscount3en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文