Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTsai, Pei-Chienen_US
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Ta-Weien_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Chung-Fengen_US
dc.contributor.authorYeh, Ming-Lunen_US
dc.contributor.authorDai, Chia-Yenen_US
dc.contributor.authorChuang, Wan-Longen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Jee-Fuen_US
dc.contributor.authorYu, Ming-Lungen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-02T05:59:37Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-02T05:59:37Z-
dc.date.issued2018-08-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1726-4901en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2017.05.015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/147906-
dc.description.abstractBackground: A direct-acting antiviral (DAA) era in hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment is fast approaching; unfortunately, the availability and affordability of DAAs in Asia Pacific areas vary, making it difficult to develop universal HCV practice guidelines appropriate for the all Asian populations. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world cost-effectiveness of IFN-based therapy according to the current strategies with PegIFN/RBV for "easy-to-treat" to provide a reference for application of future DAA development for IFN-eligible, treatment nave HCV patients. Methods: A total of 1032 chronic hepatitis C treatment-naive patients who corresponded to response-guided therapy (RGT) guidelines of PegIFN/RBV regimens were linked to the entire population of expenditures and order in the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. The average total cost per SVR achieved was calculated as the summation of the total cost for all treated patients/number of SVR cases. Results: Current RGT suggested 24 weeks of PegIFN/RBV for GI naive patients with baseline LVL and RVR at treatment week 4 achieved an average treatment cost per SVR of $5090 +/- 2400. This was of superior cost-effectiveness compared with those other subgroups of GI patients. In terms of G2 patients, according to current RGT of 16 weeks of treatment duration, PegIFN/RBV treatment with RVR achieved was of a very competitive cost per SVR ($3237 +/- 488). Conclusion: For a nave patient in the new DAA era, the PegIFN/RBV treatment might be conserved for those with all favorable risk parameters, considering the treatment duration and cost per SVR, in the resource-constrained countries. Copyright (C) 2018, the Chinese Medical Association. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectChronic hepatitis Cen_US
dc.subjectCost-effectiveness analysisen_US
dc.subjectNaiveen_US
dc.subjectPegylated interferonen_US
dc.subjectResponse-guided therapyen_US
dc.titleA real world cost effectiveness analysis of interferon-based therapy for HCV naive super-respondersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcma.2017.05.015en_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONen_US
dc.citation.volume81en_US
dc.citation.spage670en_US
dc.citation.epage675en_US
dc.contributor.department生物科技學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentCollege of Biological Science and Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000439681300003en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles