Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChiang, Andrew Cheng-Tingen_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Justin Chun-Teen_US
dc.contributor.authorWijayanti, Dewi Ratnaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Duu-Jongen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-02T05:58:22Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-02T05:58:22Z-
dc.date.issued2013-03-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1876-1070en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2012.11.011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/150493-
dc.description.abstractThis study compared performance on boron rejection in seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) membrane filtration in a high pressure cross-flow cell. Real seawaters were sampled at the north, east and south coast of Taiwan and the intake ports of SWRO plants in Penghu and Matsu islands. Four types of flat-sheet RO membranes (SG from GE Osmonics and UTC80, UTC80A, and UTC80S from Toray Industries) were tested. Permeate flux, feed flow rate and boron concentrations at room temperature were recorded over testing time. The UTC-series membranes have better performance on both boron and sodium rejection than SG membrane at all tested pH's. Test data sets were available for the first time using SWRO membrane for boron rejection from seawaters in Taiwan. (c) 2012 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectReverse osmosisen_US
dc.subjectBoron rejectionen_US
dc.subjectTDS rejectionen_US
dc.subjectSeawatersen_US
dc.titleBoron removal with UTC-series reverse osmosis filtrationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jtice.2012.11.011en_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF THE TAIWAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERSen_US
dc.citation.volume44en_US
dc.citation.spage317en_US
dc.citation.epage321en_US
dc.contributor.department防災與水環境研究中心zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDisaster Prevention and Water Environment Research Centeren_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000315838100027en_US
dc.citation.woscount4en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles