完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorShao, Shuaien_US
dc.contributor.authorHailes, Peteren_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Tsang-Yien_US
dc.contributor.authorWu, Jwo-Yuhen_US
dc.contributor.authorMaunder, Robert G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAl-Hashimi, Bashir M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHanzo, Lajosen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-05T00:08:43Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-05T00:08:43Z-
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-877Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2019.2893851en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/152833-
dc.description.abstractChannel coding may be viewed as the best-informed and most potent component of cellular communication systems, which is used for correcting the transmission errors inflicted by noise, interference, and fading. The powerful turbo code was selected to provide channel coding for mobile broad band data in the 3G UMTS and 4G long term evolution cellular systems. However, the 3GPP standardization group has recently debated whether it should be replaced by low density parity check (LDPC) or polar codes in 5G new radio, ultimately reaching the decision to adopt the LDPC code family for enhanced mobile broad band (eMBB) data and polar codes for eMBB control. This paper summarizes the factors that influenced this debate, with a particular focus on the application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) implementation of the decoders of these three codes. We show that the overall implementation complexity of turbo, LDPC, and polar decoders depends on numerous other factors beyond their computational complexity. More specifically, we compare the throughput, error correction capability, flexibility, area efficiency, and energy efficiency of ASIC implementations drawn from 110 papers and use the results for characterizing the advantages and disadvantages of these three codes as well as for avoiding pitfalls and for providing design guidelines.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectTutorialsen_US
dc.subjectcommunications technologyen_US
dc.subjectinformation theoryen_US
dc.subjectchannel codingen_US
dc.subjectturbo codesen_US
dc.subjectparity check codesen_US
dc.titleSurvey of Turbo, LDPC, and Polar Decoder ASIC Implementationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/COMST.2019.2893851en_US
dc.identifier.journalIEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALSen_US
dc.citation.volume21en_US
dc.citation.issue3en_US
dc.citation.spage2309en_US
dc.citation.epage2333en_US
dc.contributor.department電信工程研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Communications Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000483018200009en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文