Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBarr, Danielen_US
dc.contributor.authorChan, Dannyen_US
dc.contributor.authorGarfinkel, Susanen_US
dc.contributor.authorHammatt, Zoeen_US
dc.contributor.authorIchikawa, Iekunien_US
dc.contributor.authorKalichman, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorLalani, El-Nasiren_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, In Jaeen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Fredericken_US
dc.contributor.authorMah, Ericen_US
dc.contributor.authorMayer, Tonyen_US
dc.contributor.authorPalittapongarnpim, Prasiten_US
dc.contributor.authorSawicka, Theresaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSham, Mai Haren_US
dc.contributor.authorShastri, Surendraen_US
dc.contributor.authorSun, Pingen_US
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Paulen_US
dc.contributor.authorTzeng, Oviden_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-02T23:54:34Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-02T23:54:34Z-
dc.date.issued1970-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0898-9621en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1715220en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/153531-
dc.description.abstractIn 2017, the University of Hong Kong and the University of California San Diego co-hosted the first Asian meeting of the recently formed Asia Pacific Research Integrity (APRI) network in Hong Kong. Aligned with planning meetings in 2015 and 2016 funded in part by the US Office of Research Integrity (ORI), the Hong Kong meeting was designed by a multi-national planning committee to address pressing challenges in research integrity: improving multi-national communication; exchanging information on managing misconduct investigations; and sharing best practices to promote research integrity. To create a sustainable, robust international partnership to promote research integrity in the region, the purpose of this 2017 meeting was to foster multi-national awareness, understanding, and opportunities for collaboration. The meeting was defined by four objectives that emerged from the previous meetings: (1) Articulate differences as well as areas of common ground; (2) Identify best or recommended practices; (3) Identify opportunities for research or collaboration; and (4) Set an APRI network agenda for coming years. The key anticipated outcome was to advance the conversation surrounding research integrity among academic institutions and regulators in Asian and Pacific Rim nations. This outcome was evidenced by meeting participation, participant satisfaction, and articulation of next steps for the APRI network.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectResearch integrityen_US
dc.subjectresearch misconducten_US
dc.subjectresponsible conduct of researchen_US
dc.subjectAsiaen_US
dc.subjectPacificen_US
dc.subjectmulti-nationalen_US
dc.titleFirst meeting in Asia of the Asia Pacific Research Integrity networken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/08989621.2020.1715220en_US
dc.identifier.journalACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCEen_US
dc.citation.spage0en_US
dc.citation.epage0en_US
dc.contributor.department生物科技學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Biological Science and Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000507152800001en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles