完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorChen, Tse-Yuen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Wen-Hsienen_US
dc.contributor.authorTzeng, Chung-Yuhen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Chi-Weien_US
dc.contributor.authorYang, Chih-Changen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Hsien-Teen_US
dc.contributor.authorChang, Chien-Chunen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Cheng-Yingen_US
dc.contributor.authorTsou, Hsi-Kaien_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-05T02:01:09Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-05T02:01:09Z-
dc.date.issued2020-08-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1529-9430en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.04.017en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/155186-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is an innovative procedure launched in the early 2000s. Compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, many studies show that CDA offers equivalent clinical outcomes while reducing secondary procedures and total cost. PURPOSE: We sought to determine the incidence of anterior bone loss after CDA and the related biomechanical effects. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective chart review. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent CDA with one level Bryan Disc (Medtronic SofamorDanek, Memphis, TN, USA) at one institution. OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiological measurements, including the extent of anterior bone loss, global alignment angle, shell angle, lordotic angle, mean degree of angle of the endplate with the horizontal line, global range of motion (ROM) and ROM of the index level were recorded. The grading of anterior bone loss of the index level was defined as Grade 0, no remodeling; Grade 1, spur disappearance or mild change in body contour; Grade 2, obvious bone regression with Bryan Disc exposure. METHODS: Anatomical measures and ROM were compared by grade of bone loss. RESULTS: Of the 121 patients included in the study, anterior bone loss was found in 53 (43.8%) on the upper adjacent level and 54 (44.6%) on the lower adjacent level. Twenty-nine patients (23.9%) had anterior bone loss in both levels. The majority of cases had Grade 1 anterior bone loss. Grade 2 bone loss was noted in the upper adjacent vertebra in only 5 patients and in 4 patients in the lower adjacent vertebra. Age, sex, operative level, and hybrid surgery had no effect on anterior bone loss. Most radiological assessments, including global alignment angle, lordotic angle, mean degree of angle of the endplate with the horizontal line, global ROM, and ROM of the index level, showed no correlation to anterior bone loss. Shell angle was found to be different in groups with or without remodeling in the upper adjacent level: 5.0 degreesin the Grade 0 group and 7.0 degrees in the Grade 1-2 group, p<. 05. CONCLUSIONS: Many more patients than predicted had anterior bone loss. Increasing the shell angle of the artificial disc may increase the incidence of anterior bone loss after CDA. Further study of the biomechanics following CDA should help clarify the mechanisms at work. (c) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectAnterior cervical discectomy and fusionen_US
dc.subjectBiomechanicsen_US
dc.subjectBone lossen_US
dc.subjectBryan discen_US
dc.subjectCervical disc arthroplastyen_US
dc.subjectRemodelingen_US
dc.subjectShell angleen_US
dc.titleAnterior bone loss after cervical Bryan disc arthroplasty: insight into the biomechanics following total disc replacementen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.spinee.2020.04.017en_US
dc.identifier.journalSPINE JOURNALen_US
dc.citation.volume20en_US
dc.citation.issue8en_US
dc.citation.spage1211en_US
dc.citation.epage1218en_US
dc.contributor.department交大名義發表zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentNational Chiao Tung Universityen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000552738700007en_US
dc.citation.woscount1en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文