完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.author甯應斌zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-29T07:48:17Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-29T07:48:17Z-
dc.date.issued2005-09-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1816-0514en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.6752/jcs.200509_(1).0001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/157466-
dc.description.abstract本文提出現代死亡與傳統死亡的三個重要區別,並且從政治的觀點(亦即,與死亡相關的社會運動與權力關係)來探討現代死亡,也將現有的死亡意識論述(如接受死亡)推論到其邏輯終點(如接受死屍)。本文也在數處例示了如何從社會理論與文化研究來思考倫理學或哲學問題。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe prevalent approach in Taiwan's thanatological discourse treats death as simply common fate of humanity, while overlooks the constructive dimension of modern death. This reductive and essentialized approach to the issues of death, in my view, provides only one-sided view on the moral and political controversies surrounding death and funeral rituals. Following theories of Giddens, Elias, Ariès, Seale and others, this essay explores the relation between death and modernity, and the politics of modern death. In the end, this essay shows the politics of dead body (corpse) is an important element of the politics of modern death and modern body.en_US
dc.language.isozh_TWen_US
dc.publisher國立陽明交通大學出版社zh_TW
dc.publisherNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Pressen_US
dc.subject現代性zh_TW
dc.subject循常例行zh_TW
dc.subject死亡zh_TW
dc.subject生死學zh_TW
dc.subject屍體zh_TW
dc.subject身體zh_TW
dc.subjectModernityen_US
dc.subjectRoutineen_US
dc.subjectDeathen_US
dc.subjectThanatologyen_US
dc.subjectCorpseen_US
dc.subjectBodyen_US
dc.title現代死亡的政治zh_TW
dc.typeCampus Publicationsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.6752/jcs.200509_(1).0001en_US
dc.identifier.journal文化研究zh_TW
dc.identifier.journalRouter: A Journal of Cultural Studiesen_US
dc.citation.issue1en_US
dc.citation.spage1en_US
dc.citation.epage45en_US
顯示於類別:文化研究


文件中的檔案:

  1. Router-2005-1-2.pdf

若為 zip 檔案,請下載檔案解壓縮後,用瀏覽器開啟資料夾中的 index.html 瀏覽全文。