完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.author莊哲偉zh_TW
dc.contributor.author謝沛蓁zh_TW
dc.contributor.author劉記帆zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChe-Wei Chuangen_US
dc.contributor.authorPei-Chen Hsiehen_US
dc.contributor.authorChi-Fan Liuen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-03T07:55:30Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-03T07:55:30Z-
dc.date.issued2020-12-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn2219-5696en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=P20110824004-202012-202101120006-202101120006-1-12&PublishTypeID=P001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://sport.sa.nctu.edu.tw/?page_id=724en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/159280-
dc.description.abstract目的:本研究旨在瞭解運動教育模式融入大專桌球課程對於課程滿意度及學習成效之影響。方法:隨機選取兩班大二必修的桌球課程班級,並將其隨機分派為運動教育模式組(40人)及傳統教學組(35人),於期初進行正拍對打及反拍對打技能前測,期末進行正拍對打、反拍對打後測、紙筆測驗及課程滿意度。結果:一、運動教育模式組不論是在反拍對打技能後測(t=16.616,p<.05)或正拍對打技能後測(t=11.390,p<.05)皆顯著優於傳統教學組。二、運動教育模式組的筆試成績顯著優於傳統教學組(t=5.896,p<.05)。三、兩組不論是在反拍對打或是正拍對打,後測成績顯著優於前測成績。四、運動教育模式組在「同儕關係」(t=9.259,p<.05),顯著優於傳統教學組;傳統教學組在「硬體設施」(t=-2.337,p<.05),顯著優於運動教育模式組。結論:一、無論採用傳統體育教學方法或運動教育模式,對大學生學習桌球技能皆達良好效果,但採用運動教育模式之教學方法較傳統教學更具學習成效。二、透過運動教育模式融入大專桌球課程,能夠增進同儕關係,促進團隊凝聚力。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The study aims to understand the differences in course satisfaction and learning effectiveness for sport education model incorporated into college table tennis teaching. Method: Two sophomore compulsory table tennis classes of students were chosen and randomly divided into two groups, sport education model (40 people) and traditional teaching (35 people). In the beginning of the semester, they had a pre-test on skills of forehand plays and backhand plays. In the end of the semester, the participants had a posttest on skills of forehand plays and backhand plays, a written test and a questionnaire on the course satisfaction. Result: (1) In terms of posttest on skills of backhand plays (t=16.616, p<.05) and skills of forehand plays (t=11.390, p<.05), the group of sport education model was much better than the group of traditional teaching. (2) The result of the written test by the group of sport education model was significantly better than the group of traditional teaching (t=5.896, p<.05). (3) As for forehand plays and backhand plays, both of the two groups had better performance in the posttest than in the pre-test. (4) The group of sport education model was significantly better than the group of traditional teaching on "peer relationship" (t=9.259, p<.05), whereas traditional teaching group was significantly better than sport education model group on "hardware facilities" (t=-2.337, p<.05). Conclusion: (1) Traditional teaching method and sport education model both have good effects on college students' table tennis skills. But teaching method of sport education model is more effective in learning than traditional teaching method. (2) The integration of sport education model into college table tennis course can enhance peer relationship and team cohesiveness.en_US
dc.language.isozh_TWen_US
dc.publisher國立交通大學體育室zh_TW
dc.publisherOffice of Physical Education National Chiao Tung Universityen_US
dc.subject大學體育zh_TW
dc.subject體育課程設計zh_TW
dc.subject體育教學zh_TW
dc.subjectcollege physical educationen_US
dc.subjectphysical education curriculum designen_US
dc.subjectphysical education teachingen_US
dc.title運動教育模式融入大專桌球教學對於課程滿意度與學習成效之差異zh_TW
dc.titleDifferences in Course Satisfaction and Learning Effectiveness for Sport Education Model Incorporated into College Table Tennis Teachingen_US
dc.typeCampus Publicationsen_US
dc.identifier.journal交大體育學刊zh_TW
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Chiao Da Physical Educationen_US
dc.citation.issue16en_US
dc.citation.spage1en_US
dc.citation.epage12en_US
顯示於類別:交大體育學刊