Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chung, SS | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Liaw, ST | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Yih, CM | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, ZH | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lin, CJ | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kuo, DS | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Liang, MS | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-08T15:26:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-08T15:26:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn | 0-7803-6587-9 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11536/19165 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper, a comprehensive study of n- and p-channel flash cells in terms of performance and reliability is presented. In particular, the hot-carrier reliability issues such as disturbs, endurance, in both n- and p-channel flash cells are also investigated. The most serious reliability issue in p-channel flash memory, drain disturb, can be overcome by using DINOR structure. These results can be used as a guideline for designers to choose. Although the n-channel flash cell exhibits higher electron mobilities, the p-channel flash cell is most advantageous with features such as high speed, better reliability, and low power. These meet the scaling trend such that it is a promising candidate for future flash memory applications. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.title | N-channel versus P-channel flash EEPROM - Which one has better reliabilities | en_US |
dc.type | Proceedings Paper | en_US |
dc.identifier.journal | 39TH ANNUAL PROCEEDINGS: INTERNATIONAL RELIABILITY PHYSICS SYMPOSIUM 2001 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 67 | en_US |
dc.citation.epage | 72 | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | 電子工程學系及電子研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Electronics Engineering and Institute of Electronics | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosnumber | WOS:000169198000013 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Conferences Paper |