Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLin, YBen_US
dc.contributor.authorChang, MFen_US
dc.contributor.authorRao, HCHen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:45:13Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:45:13Z-
dc.date.issued2000-06-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1070-9916en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/98.847918en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/30471-
dc.description.abstractDuring the past few years, the mobile prepaid service has been growing exponentially all over the world. Four approaches have been proposed to provide mobile prepaid service. We describe these approaches and compare their strengths and weaknesses. Our analysis indicates that the handset based approach is a low-cost, high-risk solution. The wireless intelligent network approach is a high-cost, low-risk solution. The service node approach is a quick solution, which allows fast deployment with limited capacity. The hot billing approach is an average solution that cannot provide real-time rating.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleMobile prepaid phone servicesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/98.847918en_US
dc.identifier.journalIEEE PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONSen_US
dc.citation.volume7en_US
dc.citation.issue3en_US
dc.citation.spage6en_US
dc.citation.epage14en_US
dc.contributor.department友訊交大聯合研發中心zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentD Link NCTU Joint Res Ctren_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000087695400002-
dc.citation.woscount12-
Appears in Collections:Articles


Files in This Item:

  1. 000087695400002.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.