Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hsiuyingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:48:36Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:48:36Z-
dc.date.issued2010-08-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-1305en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1198/tast.2010.09125en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/32327-
dc.description.abstractThe prediction interval is an important tool in medical applications for predicting the number of times a disease will occur in a population. The performance of the existing prediction intervals, however, is unsatisfactory when the true proportion is near a boundary. Since the true proportion can be very small in real applications, in this article, we propose improved prediction intervals with better coverage probability than the existing methods. Their predictive distributions are compared in terms of the Kullback-Leibler distance and the intervals are compared using a hearing screening medical example.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectBinomial distributionen_US
dc.subjectCoverage probabilityen_US
dc.subjectPrediction intervalen_US
dc.subjectPredictive distributionen_US
dc.titleClosed Form Prediction Intervals Applied for Disease Countsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1198/tast.2010.09125en_US
dc.identifier.journalAMERICAN STATISTICIANen_US
dc.citation.volume64en_US
dc.citation.issue3en_US
dc.citation.spage250en_US
dc.citation.epage256en_US
dc.contributor.department統計學研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Statisticsen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000281262700009-
dc.citation.woscount1-
Appears in Collections:Articles


Files in This Item:

  1. 000281262700009.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.