Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author帝幕en_US
dc.contributor.authorBilozerov Tymuren_US
dc.contributor.author王維志en_US
dc.contributor.authorWei Chih Wangen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-12T01:16:20Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-12T01:16:20Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://140.113.39.130/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#GT009516588en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/38739-
dc.description.abstractThe tendering system is a way of delivering construction work. Each country has its own tendering systems for public construction work based on the characteristics of its domestic market and practices. Different countries face problems after awarding the contract of a construction project due to drawbacks in their tendering systems. Experience learned from other countries supports the reform of tendering system for a country. This research concentrates on the comparison of tendering systems of construction work between Taiwan and Ukraine. Taiwan, an East Asia country, has been developed rapidly and its construction industry has played an important role in Taiwanese industry. Ukraine is a European country, where construction work has occupied with the biggest part of investment in the country. To join the World Trade Organization (WTO), Taiwan developed a Government Procurement Act in 1998. Ukraine copied its government procurement laws from Russia and it is not a member of WTO. Based on this study, the tendering systems of construction work have a lot in common and several differences for both countries. Countries based on different government laws have different structures of tendering systems. Both countries can learn experience of each other and borrow some parts of tendering structure to innovate and improve the tendering systems.zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe tendering system is a way of delivering construction work. Each country has its own tendering systems for public construction work based on the characteristics of its domestic market and practices. Different countries face problems after awarding the contract of a construction project due to drawbacks in their tendering systems. Experience learned from other countries supports the reform of tendering system for a country. This research concentrates on the comparison of tendering systems of construction work between Taiwan and Ukraine. Taiwan, an East Asia country, has been developed rapidly and its construction industry has played an important role in Taiwanese industry. Ukraine is a European country, where construction work has occupied with the biggest part of investment in the country. To join the World Trade Organization (WTO), Taiwan developed a Government Procurement Act in 1998. Ukraine copied its government procurement laws from Russia and it is not a member of WTO. Based on this study, the tendering systems of construction work have a lot in common and several differences for both countries. Countries based on different government laws have different structures of tendering systems. Both countries can learn experience of each other and borrow some parts of tendering structure to innovate and improve the tendering systems.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectprocurementzh_TW
dc.subjecttenderzh_TW
dc.subjectregulationzh_TW
dc.subjectbidingzh_TW
dc.subjectcomparisonzh_TW
dc.subject台灣zh_TW
dc.subject烏克蘭zh_TW
dc.subjectprocurementen_US
dc.subjecttenderen_US
dc.subjectregulationen_US
dc.subjectbidingen_US
dc.subjectcomparisonen_US
dc.subjectTaiwanen_US
dc.subjectUkraineen_US
dc.title台灣與烏克蘭招標方法之比較zh_TW
dc.titleComparing Tendering Systems of Consrtuction Work between Taiwan and Ukraineen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.department土木工程學系zh_TW
Appears in Collections:Thesis


Files in This Item:

  1. 658801.pdf
  2. 658802.pdf
  3. 658803.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.