創造宜蘭新故鄉：生活風格移居類型研究

Abstract

本文所關注的是現代人生活風格的實踐與自我認同的結合，是如何發生在人與地的相互連結上。藉由歷年來宜蘭縣府團隊的施政願景與施政目標，鋪陳「宜蘭品牌」作為基礎，使宜蘭成為一個「心靈故鄉」與「幸福家園」的再現；再佐以近年北宜高速公路通車後，帶給宜蘭的衝擊與影響，連帶使得地價飆漲，形成「豪華農舍」的現象。 綜合談論宜蘭背景資料之後，並以四種類型的移居者作為觀察與訪談對象，分別是：華德福家長群、友善小農、民宿業者，與其他因個人因素而移居至宜蘭者。藉由訪談者移居宜蘭前後的居住史，了解其中選擇理想家園的條件為何、象徵資本的運用情形，以及滿足自我心中「好生活」的實踐過程。 不論移居動機為何，移居者皆試圖從事一種新的生活實驗，看重的是生活品質與居家環境，並在自我實踐的想像與真實中，形成了生活風格的社群，使得個人的生活方式延伸為集體的生活風格，並從中衍生對宜蘭的地方感。最後從個人認同層次、風格社群層次與地方感的建立，這三方面做總結，討論「美好生活」的異與同。

This thesis is focusing on the combinations of life style and self-identity in present generation, and how these combinations happened on the interconnection of human beings and regions. Forming the brand, “Yilan“, with policy goals and administration visions, Yilan government made Yilan representing a “mind-homeland” or a “bliss home” in the past several years; Furthermore, the new expressway between Yilan and Taipei brings Yilan with one giant impact, which is strongly rising home price and forming a phenomena called “ luxurious farmhouse” . Taking a global view of Yilan background data, this thesis set four kinds of migrators as respondents, including: Waldorf parents, friendly farmers, private hotel holders and other migrators with their own personal reasons which encourage them move to Yilan. With the residency histories of these migrators before and after their migrations, it helps thesis author to understand the conditions of an ideal hometown, the signification of capital utilization, and the practical procedure of satisfying the “Good life” in these migrators’ minds. No matter what the migration motivations should be, all the migrators try to perform a new life experiment, which pays much more attentions to living quality and home environment. Moreover, migrators with their self-practice in imagination and realization, form their unique lifestyle community which extends personal lifestyle to group lifestyle and derives a sense of place in Yilan. In the end, this thesis makes conclusions in three views (self-identity, group lifestyle and senses of place) by discussing the homology and heterogeneity of “Good Life”.