标题: 钢铁桥梁检测与修护方法选择之研究
The Research on the Inspection and Choice of Rehabilitation Method for the Steel Bridge
作者: 苏伦民
Luen-Ming Su
吴水威、徐耀赐
Shoei-Uei Wu、 Yao T. Hsu
土木工程学系
关键字: 钢铁桥梁、检测、修护;Steel Bridge、Inspection、Rehabilitation
公开日期: 1994
摘要: 钢铁桥梁因其材料之力学特性较混凝土优越,在现代交通建设中扮演重要
的角色。钢桥在使用年限中,常因意外事故、驾驶人操作不当、自然腐蚀
而造成损坏。然在国内混凝土桥梁研究者不乏其人,而钢桥则少有研究者
。因此,本研究以钢桥为主题,将研究范围限制在“上部结构”,探讨适
用于钢桥的检测方法、常见的损坏现象、各种常用的修护方法,研究可能
影响钢桥修护方法选择之因素、建立修护方法选择之层级架构,使用“分
析阶层程序法”决定各评估准则之权重,再运用“质化与量化多评估准则
”建立评估模式,以求出最佳之修护方法。本研究中举出FHWA常用的检测
技术,并将适用于钢桥之非破坏性检测技术作更进一步的比较分析。对钢
桥常发生的损坏现象归纳分析其发生原因,并对各种检测周期与杆件重要
性、损坏现象列表分析。至于钢桥常用的修护方法计有:直化法、焊接法
、螺栓法、部份更换、完全更换、组合修护等。但是桥梁修护时考虑重点
为安全、经济与社会成本。因而将修护方法选择的层级架构分为非使用者
观点、使用者观点、修护特性、工程经济四个标的,而在其下之准则有:
美观程度、周边冲击程度、交通维持、修护延时、修护耐久性、修护后之
强度、修护后之韧性、修护成本、桥梁剩余寿命。再利用AHP 与“质化与
量化多评估准则”结合为本研究之评估模式,最后进行例证研究以说明本
研究之评估模式。
Steel bridges play an important part in modern traffic
construction because their mechanical characteristics of
material are superior to those of concrete ones. Steel bridges
are often damaged within the valid years in use due to traffic
accident, unsuitable driving skill, and natural erosion. I
explore the effective methods of inspecting steel bridge
prevalent damage condition, and various methods of rehabilita-
tion. Besides, I study the factors that will influence the
choice of rehabilitation methods employed in steel bridges. I
also establish the hierarchy framework of choosing rehabilita-
tion method. On the other hand, I adopt "Analytic Hierarchy
Process (AHP)" to decide the weight of various criteria of
evaluation; then I use "Multicriteria Evaluation with Qualita-
tive and Quantitative to build the evaluating model. By doing
these we can try to acquire the best method of rehabilitation.
However, the emphases of rehabilitating steel bridges are put
on safety, economics, and the society cost. Thus, the hierarchy
framework of affecting the choice rehabilitation method is
divided into four goals: the view of non-user, the view of
user, the attribute of repairs, and the engineering economics.
The goals are on the basis of 9 criteria. Next, I combine AHP
and "Multicriteria Evaluation with Qualitative and Quantitative
Data" as the evaluation model of my research. Finally, I do an
assumed case study to demonstrate the evalua- tion model.
URI: http://140.113.39.130/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#NT830015002
http://hdl.handle.net/11536/58691
显示于类别:Thesis